News & Events

HHS Issues Final Rule on the ACA's Anti-Discrimination Provisions

Submitted By Firm: Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC

Contact(s): Kathlyn Perez, Phyllis G. Cancienne, Robert C. Divine


Daniel Sternthal and Layna Cook Rush

Date Published: 9/9/2016

Article Type:

Share This:

On May 18, 2016, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule (the Rule) implementing the prohibition on discrimination under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Section 1557 prohibits certain health care entities from discriminating in certain health programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability and sex by reference to several other federal anti-discrimination laws – Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (Age Act) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504). Section 1557 is the first federal civil rights law to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in all health programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. According to HHS, the Rule was enacted to help advance equity and reduce health disparities by protecting some of the populations that have been most vulnerable to discrimination in the health care context.

The Rule imposes a variety of specific and, in some instances, technical requirements to further the anti-discrimination goals of Section 1557. The Rule is effective as of July 18, 2016, but certain notices are not required to be sent out until October 24, 2016, and provisions that require changes to plan benefit design are effective in the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2017.


All health programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance are subject to Section 1557, including those not funded through HHS. The Rule, however, is narrower and applies only to entities that provide health-related services or health-related insurance coverage and whose programs or activities receive federal financial assistance. The Rule covers:

  • Any health program or activity, any part of which receives funding from HHS (such as hospitals that accept Medicare or doctors who accept Medicaid); 
  • Any health program that HHS itself administers; and
  • Any entity created under Title I of the ACA including Health Insurance Marketplaces and issuers that participate in those Marketplaces.

The following are types of entities that must comply with the Rule if receiving the applicable federal financial assistance: laboratories, hospitals, clinics, public health centers, health-related education facilities and state Medicaid agencies. In addition, entities and physicians receiving Medicaid or Medicare (excluding Medicare Part B) are covered by the Rule. Moreover, if any part of an entity's health-related activities or programs receives federal financial assistance as defined by the Rule, then all of that entity's programs and activities are subject to the Rule's requirements.


1. General Non-discrimination

The Rule prohibits denial of benefits and exclusion from participation in covered health care programs and discrimination under any health program or activity that receives the applicable federal financial assistance. While this prohibition is to be applied broadly, the Rule does include several limitations. For example, the Rule incorporates the exclusions in the Age Act, such that the anti-discrimination provisions will not apply to any age distinction contained in any law or ordinance which provides benefits or assistance based on age, establishes criteria for participation in age-related terms or describes intended beneficiaries to target groups in age-related terms. Second, the general prohibition does not apply to discrimination against employees by health care employers. Additionally, although HHS encourages covered health care programs to voluntarily implement non-discrimination policies on the basis of religion or sexual orientation, discrimination on these grounds are not prohibited by the Rule. Further, although HHS declined to include a blanket religious exception, compliance with the provision is not required if its application would violate applicable federal statutory protections for religious freedom. Lastly, the Rule permits sex-specific programs or activities where the covered health care program can show an "exceedingly persuasive justification." This means that a covered health care program must demonstrate that the exclusion of one sex is substantially related to the achievement of a health-related or scientific goal through objective evidence and empirical data.

2. Specific Application: Individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP)

The Rule requires covered health care programs to take reasonable steps to facilitate effective communications to individuals with limited English proficiency through language assistance. Language assistance must be provided through a qualified translator or interpreter, and reliance on unqualified staff or persons accompanying an individual with LEP for interpretation is prohibited (with the exception of emergencies). Similarly, automated translation is not permitted unless reviewed and edited as needed by a qualified translator. The required language assistance must be available in a timely manner; however, no specific time frame is provided in the Rule. HHS also encourages, but does not require, covered health care programs to implement a written language access plan that facilitates its ability to meet their obligations under the Rule, such as addressing how the entity will determine an individual's primary language, identifying a service for accessing qualified interpreters when the need arises, types of language assistance services that may be required under particular circumstances and documents for which translations should be routinely available.

3. Specific Application: Individuals with Disabilities

The Rule specifies several sets of requirements geared towards ensuring equal health care access for the disabled. First, covered health care programs are required to provide disabled individuals with accessible buildings and facilities. Second, disabled individuals must be provided with effective communication, such as through auxiliary aids and services, which includes the provision of qualified interpreters, qualified readers, audio recordings and Braille materials. Additionally, all health programs or activities provided through electronic and information technology, such as online booking and electronic billing, must be made available to individuals with disabilities. HHS does not provide specific accessibility standards, but encourages covered health care programs to consider the standards set forth in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Exemplar standards include providing text alternatives for any non-text content, creating content that can be presented in different ways and making it easier for users to see and hear content.

Covered health care programs are also required to make reasonable modifications to avoid discrimination based on disability, except where modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the health program or activity, or would be an undue financial or administrative burden.

4. Specific Application: Equal Program Access on the Basis of Sex

The Rule also requires that covered health care programs provide individuals with equal access to health programs and activities without discrimination on the basis of sex. The term "on the basis of sex" is defined to include gender identity, which refers to an individual's internal sense of gender, whether or not that gender is the same as the gender the individual was assigned at birth. Covered health care programs must treat individuals consistent with their gender identity. Single-sex access facilities, such as restrooms, are not prohibited, but covered health care programs must treat individuals consistent with their gender identities. Additionally, covered health insurance issuers cannot categorically exclude coverage for all health services related to gender transition, although the Rule does not mandate coverage for gender transition services.

As noted, the Rule does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. However, HHS stated in the Rule's preamble that it supports prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination as a policy matter and will continue to monitor legal developments before explicitly including the prohibition of such discrimination in a rule. In the meantime, the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) will evaluate complaints based on sexual orientation discrimination to determine whether the complaint involves discriminatory sex stereotyping.


The Rule requires that each covered health care program take steps to provide notice to its beneficiaries, enrollees, applicants and the public of its compliance with the Rule's various policies and requirements, as well as how to file grievances and a complaint with the HHS OCR. Appendix A to the Rule provides a sample notice and a sample non-discrimination statement. Additionally, covered health care programs must post short statements in the top 15 non-English languages spoken in the state in which the entity is located or does business (referred to as taglines) to notify individuals with limited English proficiency that free language services are available in these languages. By October 24, 2016 (90 days after the Rule's effective date), covered health care programs must post the required notices and taglines in applicable and significant publications and communications, conspicuous physical locations and a conspicuous location on its website. In addition, notices and taglines in at least the top two non-English languages in the relevant state must be posted in significant publications and communications that are small-sized, such as postcards and tri-fold brochures. Appendix B to the Rule provides a sample tagline.

Enforcement and Penalties

To promote compliance, covered health care programs employing 15 or more people are required to designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with the Rule, including the investigation of communicated grievances and adoption of grievance procedures for alleged violations of the Rule. Appendix C to the Rule provides a sample grievance procedure. HHS stated in the preamble to the Rule that covered health care programs are not required to train their employees on compliance with Section 1557 and the Rule, but training is encouraged and the OCR will make a training curriculum available.

Several enforcement mechanisms are provided for under the Rule. First, each covered health care program must keep records and compliance reports to submit to the OCR as the OCR deems necessary. If an entity fails to provide the OCR with the requested information in a timely, complete and accurate manner, the OCR may penalize the entity by suspending or terminating its federal financial assistance. Second, HHS may file an administrative enforcement action against a covered health care program. Third, an individual may file a complaint with the OCR for a violation of the prohibition against discrimination, and the OCR will then initiate an investigation. Finally, the Rule allows for a private cause of action; an individual or entity may bring a civil action to challenge a Section 1557 violation in federal court. Compensatory damages are available for Section 1557 violations and attorney's fees may also be appropriate.


The final Rule which implements ACA Section 1557's anti-discrimination provisions is expansive, as it applies to all health programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance through HHS, including Medicaid, most providers that accept Medicare and issuers of Marketplace plans. Because the Rule extends sex discrimination protections to health care programs and activities, and includes gender identity as a prohibited basis of discrimination, covered health care programs need to review their current policies to ensure that they are in compliance and make any necessary modifications. Furthermore, because of the detailed requirements for providing notice to individuals with disabilities or with limited English proficiency, covered health care programs should evaluate and make the necessary changes to comply with the Rule's notice provisions.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel