News & Events

IRS Clarifies and Modifies Code Section 409A Guidance

Submitted By Firm: Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

Contact(s): Louis P. DiLorenzo, Thomas G. Eron


Date Published: 7/13/2016

Article Type:

Share This:

The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") recently proposed new regulations that are intended to clarify and modify existing IRS guidance regarding the application of Internal Revenue Code section 409A ("Section 409A") to various non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements. The IRS indicated that the clarifications and modifications ". . . will help taxpayers comply with the requirements of section 409A." (The IRS also proposed regulations under Internal Revenue Code section 457(f), which will be of particular interest to tax-exempt and governmental employers. We expect to publish a separate Information Memo on those regulations shortly.)

Section 409A Refresher

Section 409A includes complex requirements that must be satisfied in order to accomplish the effective deferral of compensation that is earned in one year and paid in a later year. Section 409A generally provides that if a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement fails to satisfy the applicable requirements of Section 409A, all compensation deferred under that arrangement must be included in the affected service provider’s current gross income (even if not payable until some later year) to the extent the compensation is not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and has not previously been included in gross income. In addition to the resulting ordinary income tax consequences that may be triggered by any such premature income recognition, a failure to satisfy the applicable Section 409A requirements can result in an affected individual being subject to both a special 20 percent excise tax on the amounts required to be included in income and an interest surcharge/penalty on the taxes owed. In certain circumstances, other, compliant nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements may have to be aggregated with the noncompliant arrangement, and the same adverse tax consequences could apply to benefits accrued pursuant to those other arrangements.

For purposes of Section, 409A, the term "non-qualified deferred compensation plan" includes not only "traditional" deferred compensation agreements and plans but also a wide variety of other compensation arrangements where an employee, an independent contractor, or a member of a Board of Directors or a Board of Trustees has a legally binding right to compensation that will be paid in a later tax year. Arrangements that can be subject to Section 409A include offer letters, employment agreements, severance pay arrangements, separation agreements, bonus plans, incentive compensation arrangements, reimbursement arrangements, supplemental benefit plans, excess benefit plans, stock appreciation rights plans, "phantom" stock plans, change-in-control arrangements, retention bonus arrangements, split-dollar life insurance arrangements, consulting agreements, director fee agreements, and other similar plans and arrangements (regardless of the number of people or entities covered).

Given the broad definition of non-qualified deferred compensation plan under Section 409A, the strict rules of application, and the harsh consequences that can apply in the event of even the slightest violation, employers and covered service providers should welcome any guidance that will help make compliance easier.

Newly Proposed Regulations

The newly proposed regulations do not provide any broad or sweeping simplifications to the complex Section 409A rules. Rather, the IRS characterized the new guidance as "narrow" and with "specific purpose." Nevertheless, the new guidance should be helpful in the right circumstances.

Among other changes, the clarifications and modifications include the following:

  • Many otherwise covered arrangements can be treated as exempt from the requirements of Section 409A, if payments are completed within a short period of time after the right to the payments is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. This exemption is referred to as the "short-term deferral" exemption or "short-term deferral" rule. The proposed regulations modify the short-term deferral exemption to provide that the exemption may still apply if payments are delayed beyond the permitted short-term deferral period in order to avoid a violation of Federal securities laws or other applicable law.
  • Stock options and stock appreciation rights can be treated as exempt from the requirements of Section 409A if (among a number of other requirements) the underlying stock is considered "service recipient stock." The term "service recipient stock" generally means the service recipient’s common stock, but does not include any stock that is subject to a mandatory repurchase obligation (other than a right of first refusal), or a permanent put or call right, if the stock price under such right or obligation is based on a measure other than the fair market value of the underlying stock. The proposed regulations clarify that an otherwise exempt stock right will not be treated as subject to Section 409A solely because the amount payable under the stock right upon the holder’s involuntary separation from service for cause, or the occurrence of a condition within the holder’s control, is based on a measure that is less than the fair market value of the underlying stock.
  • Certain severance/separation pay plans are exempt from the requirements of Section 409A. Generally, an exempt plan must provide: benefits only upon a covered individual’s involuntary separation from service; limit benefits to no more than two times the compensation earned by the individual during year prior to the separation from service; and complete payments by the end of the second year after the year of the involuntary separation from service. The proposed regulations clarify that the separation pay plan exemption can still apply in the case of a covered service provider who had no compensation in the prior year because employment began and ended in the same year. In that circumstance, the proposed regulations provide that the service provider’s annualized compensation for the year in which the service provider separates from service may be used for purposes of determining the amount of the maximum (exempt) benefit. This change makes it clear that an otherwise exempt separation pay plan can provide exempt benefits to an employee who is hired and involuntarily terminated in the same year.
  • Although Section 409A generally applies to taxable expense reimbursements, the proposed regulations provide that Section 409A will not apply to an arrangement under which an employee or other service provider has a right to the payment or reimbursement of reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred to pursue a bona fide legal claim against the service recipient with respect to the service relationship.
  • In service relationships where services are regularly rendered over periods that begin in one taxable year and end in the next taxable year, and that are less than 12 months long (for example, a teacher providing services during a school year comprised of 10 months), Section 409A will not apply to amounts that are earned in the first year and paid in the next year if (i) payments for the services are completed by the last day of the 13th month following the first day of the service period, and (ii) the service provider’s total recurring part-year compensation (not merely the amount deferred) does not exceed the annual compensation limit under Internal Revenue Code section 401(a)(17) ($265,000 for 2016) for the calendar year in which the service period commences. This modification of the recurring part-year compensation rule should mean that the rule/exemption can be applied to more arrangements than before the modification.
  • The Section 409A rules regarding when a service provider has had a separation from service have been clarified in the case of a service provider who ceases providing services as an employee and begins providing services as an independent contractor. In those circumstances (which can raise a number of non-Section 409A risks), the service provider is treated as having a separation from service if, at the time of the change in employment status, the level of services reasonably anticipated to be provided after the change would result in a separation from service under the rules applicable to employees.
  • The rules applicable to amounts payable following a service provider’s death have been liberalized to allow more time to complete the payments without triggering a Section 409A violation.
  • With respect to payments to a deceased service provider’s beneficiary, amending an arrangement to provide for an accelerated payment in the event of the death, disability, or unforeseeable emergency of the beneficiary will not violate Section 409A’s general prohibition on the acceleration of payments.
  • Various provisions have been modified to make it clear that, while the typical deferred compensation arrangement involves an individual service provider, Section 409A can apply to arrangements in which the service provider is an entity.

Correcting Non-Vested Deferred Compensation Arrangements

In addition to the clarifications and modifications noted above, the IRS also provided helpful guidance regarding the correction of certain non-compliant deferred compensation arrangements. Specifically, to the extent an amount of deferred compensation is not vested (and will not become vested during the current year), an employer or other service recipient may amend a noncompliant term or provision in the written deferred compensation document in a manner permitted under IRS correction guidance that would otherwise apply to vested amounts, even though the noncompliant term or provision may not have been eligible for correction under that guidance.

For example, a number of the correction methods recognized by the IRS for vested deferred compensation are subject to compliance with strict deadlines by which the permitted correction must be made in order to avoid the full adverse consequences that are triggered by a Section 409A violation. The latest IRS guidance provides that the non-compliance with the strict deadlines will not prevent the correction of a non-compliant arrangement under which amounts remain subject to a recognized vesting (or risk of forfeiture) condition. In addition, the portion of the non-vested deferred amount that is affected by the correction will not be subject to income inclusion, additional taxes, or applicable premium interest under Section 409A, and neither the service recipient nor the affected provider is required to notify the IRS of the correction.

Recommended Action

The proposed regulations do not require service providers and service recipients to take any specific action. However, given the potentially severe adverse consequences that can apply in the case of a Section 409A violation, parties to compensation arrangements that provide for a payment or payments in a future year or future years should consider reviewing those arrangements in light of the latest guidance and correcting any noncompliant arrangements to the extent possible. Correcting a noncompliant arrangement before the right to payments becomes vested can eliminate exposure to the adverse consequences that can apply in the case of a Section 409A violation.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel