News & Events

Two Steps Forward? Re-Examining U.S. Sanctions Against Cuba

Date Published: 12/19/2014

Article Type:

Share This:

On December 18, 2014, President Obama announced that the United States would reduce its comprehensive economic sanctions program against Cuba. The administration has concluded that the Cuba Sanctions Program is ineffective and has deterred the development of Cuban civil society and the Cuban private economic sector. The announcement portends significant change, but the specifics of that change are not yet known. It is important to note that until such time as the relevant U.S. government agencies act to amend the program, the Cuban Sanctions Program remains in force. This client update will review the current status of the Cuban Sanctions Program, the proposed changes, and some action items.

Overview of Cuban Sanctions Program

U.S. economic sanctions against Cuba are administered pursuant to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations and other regulations, primarily by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) at the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Unless and until changed, the Cuban Sanctions Program requires that any commercial transaction between a U.S. person (discussed below) involving Cuba or a Cuban company or person anywhere in the world must be licensed by OFAC (through a general or a specific license); it is OFAC’s stated policy to deny applications for specific licenses, except for many travel-related requests. Therefore, U.S. companies currently may not directly or indirectly export any good or provide any service to an end-user or customer in Cuba or any Cuban company or person anywhere in the world. Further, U.S. companies and persons currently may not import anything of value from Cuba (and you know what I mean if you’ve ever tried to ‘import’ Cuban cigars).

The Cuban Sanctions Program applies to all persons (individuals and entities) subject to U.S. jurisdiction, including all U.S. citizens and permanent residents wherever located, all persons in the United States, and all branches and subsidiaries of U.S. organizations throughout the world – as well as all persons engaging in transactions that involve property in or otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. The latter part of that jurisdictional definition reaches the activities of non-U.S. persons and businesses where some part of a prohibited Cuba-related transaction, even something as ‘small’ as an email routed through a U.S.-based server, takes place in the U.S. Complicating matters further, the U.S. stands (mostly) alone on sanctioning Cuba. Our largest trading partners, such as Canada and European Union member states, do not sanction Cuba and have statutes that punish companies based in those jurisdictions if such companies abide by any part of the U.S. program.

Criminal penalties for violating the Cuban sanctions program are severe and range up to 10 years in prison, $1,000,000 in corporate fines, and $250,000 in individual fines. Civil penalties for violations of the sanctions program can reach $65,000 per violation.

Proposed Changes to Cuban Sanctions Program

The White House, on December 17, posted a fact sheet to its website that details some of the proposed changes to the Cuban Sanctions Program and U.S. relations with Cuba. They include:

  • Establishing diplomatic relations with Cuba by re-establishing a U.S. Embassy in Havana and carrying out high-level exchanges and visits between the two governments.
  • Facilitating an expansion of travel under general licenses for the 12 existing categories of travel to Cuba authorized by law.
  • Remittance levels will increase from $500 to $2,000 per quarter for general donative remittances to Cuban nationals (excluding certain officials of the government or the Communist party); and donative remittances for humanitarian projects, support for the Cuban people, and support for the development of private businesses in Cuba will no longer require a specific license.
  • Authorizing expanded commercial sales/exports from the United States of certain goods and services, including certain building materials for private residential construction, goods for use by private sector Cuban entrepreneurs, and agricultural equipment for small farmers.
  • Licensed U.S. travelers to Cuba will be authorized to import $400 worth of goods from Cuba, of which no more than $100 can consist of tobacco products and alcohol combined.
  • U.S. financial institutions will be permitted to open correspondent accounts at Cuban financial institutions to facilitate the processing of authorized transactions.
  • The commercial export of consumer communications devices, related software, applications, hardware, and services, and items for the establishment and update of communications-related systems that will contribute to the ability of the Cuban people to communicate with people in the United States and the rest of the world will be authorized.
  • Telecommunications providers will be allowed to establish the necessary mechanisms, including infrastructure, in Cuba to provide commercial telecommunications and internet services, which will improve telecommunications between the United States and Cuba.
  • U.S.-owned or -controlled entities in third countries will be generally licensed to provide services to, and engage in financial transactions with, Cuban individuals in third countries. In addition, general licenses will unblock the accounts at U.S. banks of Cuban nationals who have relocated outside of Cuba; permit U.S. persons to participate in third-country professional meetings and conferences related to Cuba; and, allow foreign vessels to enter the United States after engaging in certain humanitarian trade with Cuba, among other measures.
  • The President has instructed the Secretary of State to immediately launch a review of Cuba’s designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism, and provide a report to the President within six months.

Potential Benefits to U.S. Companies and Suggested Action Items

Liberalization of the Cuban Sanctions Program could benefit U.S. companies (specifically those in the life sciences, infrastructure, and telecommunications sectors) in several ways:

  • It will make it easier for employees of U.S.-based companies to travel to Cuba, including engaging in certain business-related travel. This change will not make travel to Cuba (which requires U.S. citizens to obtain an entry visa prior to departure) as easy as travel to, say, Canada, but it will reduce the compliance burden on, and the export-control risk facing U.S. companies as to Cuba-related travel.
  • Revisions to the sanctions program will authorize expanded commercial sales/exports from the United States of certain goods and services. A specific list of ‘authorized’ U.S.-origin goods/products has not been developed, but life sciences companies whose product portfolios include agricultural or livestock products should see a specific opportunity, as should telecommunications and infrastructure companies.
  • Facilitating authorized financial transactions between the United States and Cuba will make it easier, faster, and more efficient for U.S. companies to be paid on future Cuba business.
  • Non-U.S. affiliates of U.S. companies will be allowed to provide services to, and engage in financial transactions with, Cuban individuals in third countries. Under the current version of the Cuban Sanctions Program, U.S. companies and their non-U.S. affiliates are prohibited from transacting with any Cuban national anywhere in the world.
  • The policy revisions call for the issuance of general licenses to unblock the accounts at U.S. banks of Cuban nationals who have relocated outside of Cuba. This will enable U.S. companies to transact as to the unblocked assets.
  • U.S. export controls on Cuba will become more consistent with those of our largest trading partners, including Canada and European Union member states. The controls will not be exactly the same, but the conflict between these control regimes will be reduced. Increased consistency will enable non-U.S. companies to coordinate their export compliance strategy more efficiently and will reduce the risk that they could violate (or be seen to violate) their home country’s law by abiding by the U.S. sanctions program against Cuba.

The most important point to be taken from the various U.S. government announcements on this topic is from an update to Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) at the U.S. Department of the Treasury OFAC’s sanctions FAQ webpage:

OFAC will implement the Treasury-specific changes via amendments to its Cuban Assets Control Regulations. The Department of Commerce will implement the remainder of the changes via amendments to its Export Administration Regulations. OFAC expects to issue its regulatory amendments in the coming weeks. None of the announced changes takes effect until the new regulations are issued.

In other words, the timing, structure, and substance of amendments will take some time to develop. We don’t yet know, for example, the precise list of products or goods that will be ‘authorized’ for export to Cuba from the U.S. under these revisions. We don’t know whether potential U.S. exporters will have some form of notice or other screening requirement in order to avail themselves of the to-be-drafted authorization. It remains possible—probable even—that U.S. economic sanctions would remain in force against parts of the Cuban government and companies or persons closely associated with the Cuban government. It seems unlikely that the Cuban government, the Communist Party or the Castro brothers would be excluded from a future sanctions program. Congress will have to legislate to change certain aspects of the Cuban Sanctions Program, and it is not known whether they have the desire or political will to do so.

However, companies should do (at least) two things in the near term to position themselves to benefit from these proposed changes: (i) review your export compliance policy to determine what can or should be changed in light of potential changes to the Cuban Sanctions Program; and (ii) carefully evaluate how your company could begin to access the Cuban market.

View on AGG Website

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel