News & Events

Our “top 10” employment, workplace & safety issues from 2014

Submitted By Firm: Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Contact(s): John Tuck


By Jane Hall (Partner), Janine Young (Partner), John Tuck (Partner), Anthony Forsyth (Consultant)

Date Published: 12/22/2014

Article Type:

Share This:


After many years of uncertainty, the High Court finally clarified in September that there is no implied term of mutual trust and confidence in employment contracts under the common law in Australia.

The High Court’s decision in Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker[1] closes off the implied term as a potential cause of action for employees seeking redress against various forms of adverse or unreasonable treatment by employers.

However, the High Court left open the possibility of the implied term of good faith as a basis for such claims, and there is already some evidence that lawyers representing employees are exploring this option.[2] Of course, employers also need to remain mindful of possible claims under the unfair dismissal, anti-bullying and general protections provisions of the FW Act, as well as health and safety and anti-discrimination legislation.

2. Workplace Bullying Claims Low

The expected avalanche of claims in the Fair Work Commission (FWC)’s new anti-bullying jurisdiction did not eventuate. In the nine months to 30 September, 532 applications for anti-bullying orders were lodged, with an order being made in just one of these cases (several other orders have since been made).

The general trend in the relatively small number of contested bullying cases has been to give a broad interpretation to the concept of “reasonable management action” which does not constitute bullying.[3] Most of these decisions have arisen in the context of performance management, which has been perceived as bullying by the employees involved.[4]

A test case decision handed down by a five-member Full Bench of the FWC on 19 December[5] held that social media posts (outside work hours) can constitute “bullying at work” – but only if the worker to whom they are directed reads them while at work. More generally, the Full Bench considered that a worker could be considered “at work” (for purposes of the anti-bullying provisions) “at any time the worker performs work, regardless of his or her location or the time of day” (the concept “is not limited to the confines of a physical workplace”).

Despite the lower than expected numbers of claims, and the decisions generally supporting the positions taken by managers, employers should remain alive to the possibility of bullying claims – and implement sound policies and training to create a positive workplace culture.

3. Sexual Harassment Damages on the Up

The Full Federal Court decision in Richardson v Oracle Corporation Australia Pty Ltd and Tucker [6] signalled an important shift in approach by Australian courts to the assessment of damages in sexual harassment cases. The Full Court awarded a former consulting manager employed by Oracle Australia damages of $130,000 for sexual harassment carried out by a male sales representative (for which Oracle was vicariously liable).

The Full Court took into account changes in the value placed by society on compensation for loss of enjoyment of life arising from harassment, finding that the award of $18,000 damages at first instance did not reflect “prevailing community standards”.

The complainant’s claim in Richardson v Oracle was brought under the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) (SD Act). In Trolan v WD Gelle Insurance and Finance Brokers Pty Ltd,[7] an employee obtained over $730,000 in damages for sexual harassment, intimidation and bullying by her boss, in an action founded in negligence (breach of duty of care).

Substantial damages for sexual harassment in breach of the SD Act were awarded in Vergara v Ewin.[8] This Full Federal Court decision was also notable for the broad approach taken by the majority judges to the concept of a “workplace” in which alleged sexual harassment or discrimination may occur. It was found that unwelcome sexual conduct occurring at a nearby hotel occurred at the workplace for purposes of the SD Act.

These decisions show that in the event that employers “get it wrong” in relation to sexual harassment and discrimination issues, there are multiple heads of potential liability – which could result in large damages payouts to employees or former employees.

4. What’s a “Complaint about Employment”?

There were numerous decisions this year examining the nature of “complaints about employment” which may form the basis of an adverse action claim under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).[9]

Overall, a fairly broad approach has been taken by the courts to the types of complaints or issues raised by employees which can found an adverse action claim – e.g. where employees have raised matters going beyond their own employment conditions, such as probity issues or even the precise manner in which certain work is carried out within the employing organisation.[10]

A narrower approach was taken by the Federal Court at first instance in Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6),[11] suggesting that an employee’s complaint could not be made in bad faith or for an ulterior purpose, and should have some basis in a contractual or statutory entitlement. However in the recent appeal decision in those proceedings, the Full Federal Court cautioned against constraining the ability of employees to make employment complaints by assessing the genuineness or bona fides of such a complaint.[12]

While the law in this area is presently unsettled, employers should assume that a wide range of expressions of discontentment by employees could lead to an adverse action claim. This means that fair and transparent processes need to be in place to deal with employee grievances.

5. High Court “Scab” Decision Affirms Barclay

In another adverse action case, the High Court applied its 2012 ruling in Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of TAFE v Barclay[13] to find that an employer had not acted in breach of Part 3-1 when it dismissed a union activist who had held an anti-“scab” sign on a picket line during protected industrial action.

In Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd,[14] the High Court (by a 3:2 majority) adopted the approach in Barclay to find that the manager’s reason for dismissing the unionist was not his involvement in lawful industrial activity (including the holding of the sign). Rather, the manager’s decision was based on a concern that the employee would not in future conform to the company’s expected standards of conduct (based partly on his behaviour during the investigation into the picket line incident).

6. The Door Opens on Cuts to Penalty Rates

Award penalty rates remain a contentious issue, particularly in the retail and hospitality sectors. As employer organisations stepped up their lobbying for penalty rate reductions, the FWC gave its first indication of a preparedness to modify these rates in Appeal by Restaurant and Catering Association of Victoria.[15]

In a 3:2 decision, the majority of the FWC Full Bench accepted the long-held position supporting the need to provide additional rewards and incentives for those who are required to work on Sundays. At the same time, the majority considered that there should be a reduction from 75% to 50% in the Sunday penalty rate for casuals employed in cafes and restaurants.

This looms as a major issue in the FWC’s four-yearly review of modern awards, with 100 hearing days set down until late next year for the FWC’s consideration of employer applications to reduce penalty rates in the main retail and hospitality awards.[16]

7. Bargaining “Hot Spots”

There has been a great deal of threatened and actual protected industrial action in bargaining disputes in 2014, particularly in the resources sector, the offshore services which support resource exploration and exporting, and on the ports.

Employers including Mermaid Marine, Teekay Shipping, Tidewater Marine, Farstad, Bechtel Australia and (more recently) DP World have all experienced various forms of protected action. The threat posed to major resource companies, including BHP Billiton and Chevron, led the Abbott Government to implement a regulation enabling the WA Government and third parties to apply to the FWC to end protected action that might (for example) adversely affect exports.[17]

Public sector bargaining was a major feature of the Victorian election campaign in November, with unions representing ambulance employees,[18] firefighters and nurses campaigning hard for the ALP. New Premier Daniel Andrews pledged resolution of the long-running ambulance dispute as one of his top priorities on winning office. On 20 December, the Victorian Government announced that a deal had been concluded with the ambulance employees’ union.[19]

The progress of the Federal Government’s Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill 2013, and the fate of the Building and Construction Industry (Fair and Lawful Building Sites) Code 2014, are of keen interest to all in the construction industry as multiple agreements come up for renewal. The Advance Release Code has now been in place since April 2014 (with amendments on 28 November 2014) and its status is a matter of heated debate. To date the construction unions have indicated a firm position of resistance to agreeing deals that are “code compliant”. This is likely to be one of the major stories of early 2015.

8. Trade Unions Royal Commission

Throughout the year, the hearings of the Royal Commission on Trade Union Governance and Corruption captured significant media attention. On 19 December, the Government released two volumes of Commissioner Heydon’s Interim Report, which recommends prosecution of current and former officials of several unions including the CFMEU, AWU and HSU.

In addition to the Royal Commission’s focus on financial malfeasance within these and other unions, the industrial tactics of the CFMEU have received particular scrutiny. The Interim Report recommends that proceedings alleging blackmail and cartel conduct be brought against officials in the union’s Victorian branch, arising from a “black ban” imposed on Boral following the Myer Grocon dispute in 2012.

9. CFMEU Grocon Contempt Proceedings

The CFMEU’s unlawful blockade of the Grocon site also resulted in the imposition of $1.25 million in fines by the Victorian Supreme Court on 31 March,[20] following findings of criminal contempt against the union in 2013.[21] This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal in October.[22] The union’s application for special leave to appeal will be considered by the High Court in February next year.

10. Workplace Health and Safety – Legislative Developments around Australia

Changes to workplace health and safety (WHS) legislation have been implemented or proposed in a number of jurisdictions, including the following:

  • Queensland passed the WHS Amendment Bill in April to require unions to give 24 hours' notice before entering workplaces, to prevent health and safety representatives (HSRs) from halting unsafe work, and to increase electrical safety fines by 650%.
  • Western Australia tabled the draft mirror Work Health and Safety Bill 2014 in October 2014 for a three month comment period, which expires at the end of January 2015.[23]
  • The New South Wales Mining Sector introduced model WHS Regulations which will commence on 1 February 2015.
  • South Australia commissioned a review of its model WHS Laws by Robin Stewart-Crompton.
  • The new Labor Victorian Government has foreshadowed significant reform to the Victorian WorkCover Authority (VWA) regime, including reviewing the effectiveness of the current Victorian Occupational Health & Safety legislation and its enforcement by the VWA.

Look out for our “Top 10” Employment, Workplace & Safety Issues for 2015, in mid-January. This will include discussion of the recently-announced terms of reference for the Productivity Commission’s Review of the FW Act and related legislation. The PC Review will be the major focus for the workplace reform debate in the year ahead, along with continued efforts by the Abbott Government to progress its legislative agenda.



[1] [2014] HCA 32 (10 September 2014); see here.

[2] “After Barker, lawyers turn to implied duty of good faith”, Workplace Express, 11 December 2014.

[3] See our earlier In Briefs here, here and here.

[4] In the recent decision in Application by G.C. [2014] FWC 6988 (9 December 2014), the FWC found that some aspects of a manager’s conduct were unreasonable (and therefore constituted bullying); however no order was made as the employee’s fixed-term contract with the employer had ended.

[5] Sharon Bowker; Annette Coombe; Stephen Zwarts v DP World Melbourne Limited T/A DP World; Maritime Union of Australia, The Victorian Branch and Others [2014] FWCFB 9227.

[6] [2014] FCAFC 82 (15 July 2014); see here.

[7] [2014] NSWDC 185 (4 November 2014).

[8] [2014] FCAFC 100 (12 August 2014); see here.

[9] See here; and here.

[10] Walsh v Greater Metropolitan Cemeteries Trust (No 2) [2014] FCA 456 (9 May 2014); Evans v Trilab Pty Ltd [2014] FCCA 2464 (30 October 2014).

[11] [2014] FCA 271 (25 March 2014).

[12] Shea v EnergyAustralia Services Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 167 (8 December 2014).

[13] [2012] HCA 32.

[14] [2014] HCA 41 (16 October 2014); see here.

[15] [2014] FWCFB 1996 (14 May 2014); this decision was upheld by the Full Federal Court in United Voice v Restaurant and Catering Association of Victoria and Fair Work Commission [2014] FCAFC 121.

[16] “100 days of hearings for penalty rates case”, Workplace Express, 18 December 2014.

[17] Fair Work Amendment (Protected Industrial Action) Regulation 2014; in September this regulation survived a disallowance motion in the Senate, with the support of the Palmer United Party along with Senators Muir, Day and Leyonhjelm.

[18] See here.

[19] See here.

[20] Grocon and Others v CFMEU (No 2) [2014] VSC 134.

[21] Grocon Constructors (Victoria) Pty Ltd v CFMEU and Others [2013] VSC 275.

[22] CFMEU v Grocon Constructors (Victoria) Pty Ltd and Others; CFMEU v Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd and Others [2014] VSCA 261.

[23] See here.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel