News & Events

Our “top 10” employment, workplace & safety issues for 2015

Submitted By Firm: Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Contact(s): John Tuck

Author(s):

By Jane Hall (Partner), John Tuck (Partner), Nicholas Ellery (Partner), Anthony Forsyth (Consultant)

Date Published: 2/1/2015

Article Type:

Share This:

In this In Brief, we look ahead and identify the 10 key issues that are likely to dominate Australian employment, workplace and safety law in 2015.

1. Productivity Commission Inquiry

The major focus of the workplace reform debate this year, undoubtedly, will be the Productivity Commission (PC) Review of the Workplace Relations Framework.

The terms of reference for this inquiry were released by the Abbott Government on 19 December 2014. They require the PC to assess the performance of the federal workplace relations framework, including the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) and instruments operating under the legislation, focusing particularly on:

  • key social and economic indicators important to national wellbeing, productivity and competitiveness;
  • the capacity of the IR framework to adapt over the longer term to issues arising due to structural adjustments and changes in the global economy;
  • the impact of the FW Act and related legislation on jobs, incomes and the economy; according to business size, region and industry sector; and with reference to the experience in other OECD countries.

On 24 January 2015, the PC released five Issues Papers[1] which provide further details of the focus of the review and invite submissions from stakeholders. The Issues Papers indicate that the following will be among the key matters to be addressed in the PC review:

  • the level of minimum wages, the connection between wages and productivity, and whether the Fair Work Commission (FWC) process for the annual review of minimum wages may need to be changed;
  • the interaction between elements of the “safety net” of minimum employment conditions, including the option of a reduced role for modern awards and provision of additional entitlements through the National Employment Standards (NES);
  • penalty rates, particularly for weekend work, including the possibility of removing regulation of penalty rates altogether (leaving employers and employees to reach agreement on whether these rates would apply);
  • various aspects of the enterprise bargaining framework, including whether there should be further limits on agreement content and pattern bargaining, whether the provisions for greenfields agreements and individual flexibility arrangements are appropriate, and whether more incentives are needed to ensure parties bargain for productivity;
  • whether the secret ballot requirements for protected industrial action are too prescriptive, the possibility of other industrial action options for employers beyond lockouts, and how legislation might address the question of “aborted” industrial action (i.e. withdrawal of notified industrial action);
  • the effects of current protections against unfair dismissal on firm costs, productivity, hiring and recruitment practices and employment structures;
  • whether the general protections under the FW Act have provided certainty and clarity to all parties;
  • the operation of the new protections against workplace bullying, including their interaction with work health and safety laws;
  • how effectively the institutions overseeing the IR system, including the FWC and the Fair Work Ombudsman, are working;
  • whether there is a greater role for competition law in regulating workplace relations;
  • the extent to which differing arrangements are needed for the regulation of employment relations in the public sector (at federal, state and local levels) as opposed to the private sector;
  • the regulation of alternative working arrangements, including contracting and labour hire (including whether enterprise agreements restrict the use of these types of labour).

 

Timetable for the PC Review throughout 2015

24 January      

PC Issues Papers released

13 March

Deadline for Initial Submissions from interested parties

June/July

PC’s Draft Report

August/September

Draft Report Public Hearings

November

PC’s Final Report

 

If your organisation is interested in making a submission to the PC Review and/or attending one of its public hearings, you can register your interest here.

An indication of the PC’s perspective on the current workplace relations framework is provided by its observation that:

[The] combined influence of the employment contract, awards, the NES and enterprise agreements on the employment relationship makes Australia’s WR system one of the most complex in the world. (PC Issues Paper 3, page 15)

Therefore, recommendations for significant amendments to the FW Act are likely to emerge from the PC inquiry. It will then be a question of which recommendations are taken up by the Government in the lead-up to the 2016 federal election – hence the importance of this review process over the next 12-18 months.

2. Federal Government’s Legislative Agenda

The PC Review was a key feature of the Coalition’s 2013 “Policy to Improve the Fair Work Laws”, which also committed the incoming Government to implementing modest changes to the FW Act in its first term of office. The Government now has the following five workplace reform Bills before federal Parliament:

  • Fair Work Amendment Bill – making the processes for entering into greenfields project agreements, and individual flexibility arrangements, more workable for employers. The Bill will also limit union rights of entry to workplaces for discussion and recruitment purposes.
  • Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Bill – increasing standards of financial accountability and reporting for office-holders in trade unions and employer organisations. Further, the Bill will establish a new Registered Organisations Commission to oversee the governance and accountability of unions and employer bodies and to provide assistance to members of these organisations in cases of impropriety or non-compliance with rules.
  • Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill – re-establishing a specialist regulator, the Australian Building and Construction Commission, to maintain the rule of law on building sites and ensure that unions comply with applicable laws relating particularly to industrial action and entry onto sites (see further at point 5 below).
  • Fair Entitlements Guarantee Amendment Bill – reducing maximum redundancy payments under the General Employee Entitlements and Redundancy Scheme (GEERS) to 16 weeks’ pay, depending on the employees’ length of service.
  • Fair Work Amendment (Bargaining Processes) Bill – requiring discussions over workplace productivity as a condition of FWC approval of enterprise agreements; and limiting rights to take protected industrial action in support of bargaining claims through two new requirements (i.e. that efforts have first been made to negotiate an agreement; and that the claims put forward are not excessive and will not adversely affect productivity).[2] A Senate Committee is scheduled to report on this Bill by 25 March 2015.

In the past six months, support from cross-bench Senators for the Government’s overall legislative program has been limited. As a result, there is a considerable backlog of proposed legislation, and the volatile situation in the Senate means that it is by no means certain that any of the five workplace reform Bills will be passed by Parliament in 2015.

3. PM Abandons Paid Parental Leave Scheme

Responding to significant pressure from the public and internally within the Government, the Prime Minister today announced that he will abandon his proposed expansion of the Paid Parental Leave (PPL) scheme. 

This decision resolves an area of considerable uncertainty for employers over the last 18 months. The current PPL scheme, introduced by the former Labor Government, will remain in place – operating in conjunction with the PPL policies adopted by many Australian businesses and public sector bodies.

4. Upcoming Bargaining Rounds

The year ahead will also see plenty of action on the bargaining front, with agreements up for renegotiation at key employers across the public and private sectors:

  • Agreement negotiations are ongoing at DP World following protected industrial action by employees and a lockout by the employer last December.
  • Protected action by Jetstar pilots may be imminent, in light of a proposed pay freeze across the Qantas Group. Qantas ground staff will be voting soon on a proposed new agreement including an 18-month pay freeze.
  • The long running negotiations between the Maritime Union of Australia and vessel operators and manning agents, regarding offshore oil and gas maritime workers, may escalate into industrial action and further litigation. The current agreements expired in 2013 and negotiations have been ongoing for more than a year.
  • Agreements will also be renegotiated in 2015 covering major employers in sectors including retail (Woolworths, Coles, David Jones), finance/insurance (CBA, Westpac, QBE, Medibank) and communications (Telstra, Optus, Seven Network).[3]
  • Industrial action is likely in the federal public sector, as the Government maintains a hard line in agreement negotiations with below-CPI pay increases on offer. Some forms of protected action were taken late last year by staff in the Department of Human Services, including Centrelink and Medicare offices. Department of Veterans’ Affairs employees have also approved protected action in a secret ballot held in December.
  • Bargaining in the Victorian public service should be less contentious than at the federal level, although the new Andrews Labor Government faces significant challenges in delivering on promises made to public sector unions. As well as resolving the long-running firefighters dispute, the Government must reach new agreements for the police force, health workers, VicRoads, Yarra Trams and Metro trains.[4] These negotiations will take place in the context of a recent Full Federal Court decision[5] affirming that enterprise agreements made under the FW Act are not subject to the implied constitutional limitations set down in the High Court’s Re AEU decision.[6] This opens the way for state public sector agreements to include provisions dealing with termination of employment, redundancy, consultation and related issues.

5. Construction Industry Codes

In addition to the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Bill (see point 2 above), the future shape of regulation in the construction sector depends greatly on whether – and when – the proposed new federal building code takes effect.

The draft Building and Construction Industry (Fair and Lawful Building Sites) Code was released in April last year. Once in force, its proposed restrictions on agreement content will apply to agreements made from 24 April 2014. Amendments to the draft Code, announced by the Government in late November, would have the effect that the agreement content limits would also apply to agreement variations.

The uncertainty surrounding the proposed new Code, and its enabling legislation, creates a complex environment for the negotiation of new agreements in the building industry.

The Andrews Government in Victoria has already moved to abolish that state’s construction code,[7] which was amended last October to impose similar limits on agreement content to those now being pursued by the Abbott Government federally.

6. Major Cases and Decisions

Four-yearly modern awards review

FWC proceedings in the four-yearly review process for modern awards will continue throughout the coming year. This will involve consideration of – and potentially changes to – several key aspects of award regulation, including:

  • penalty rates across at least nine awards;
  • annual leave;
  • public holidays;
  • award flexibility;
  • casual “conversion” provisions; and
  • the interaction between award and NES entitlements.[8]

Agreement termination “test case”

A decision is expected from a Full Bench of the FWC following hearings late last year on Aurizon’s application to terminate 14 enterprise agreements covering its Queensland workforce, amid failed efforts to negotiate a new agreement for train drivers and other operational employees.[9]

The decision affecting the rail freight operator will carry important implications for the capacity of employers to seek termination of expired agreements, particularly in the context of deadlocked negotiations for a new agreement.

CFMEU industrial action cases

The High Court will consider two separate CFMEU applications for special leave to appeal against decisions of the Victorian Court of Appeal:

  • the decision in CFMEU v Grocon Constructors (Victoria) Pty Ltd and Others [2014] VSCA 261, upholding findings of criminal contempt against the union and the imposition of $1.25 million in fines; and
  • the recent decision in CFMEU v Boral Resources (Vic) Pty Ltd and Others [2014] VSCA 348, in which the Court of Appeal upheld an earlier finding that the tort of intimidation forms part of Australian law.

7. Trade Unions Royal Commission (TURC)

The TURC’s public hearings will continue from April, with Commissioner Heydon’s final report and recommendations to be completed by 31 December 2015.

The Commissioner’s rationale for requesting the Government to extend the TURC process by 12 months included the need for further investigation into possible criminal conduct by unions/union officials, such as “physical and verbal violence, cartel conduct, secondary boycotts, contempt of court and other institutional orders and the encouragement of others to commit these contempts”.[10]

It will be very interesting to see the directions in which those investigations are focused over the course of the coming year.

8. FWC Appeals Jurisdiction

It should become clear this year whether the Government is serious about implementing its proposal to create a separate appeals jurisdiction for the FWC.

The Australian Mines and Metals Association has strongly advocated the need for a separate appeals body due to inconsistencies in FWC single member decisions, while the Law Council of Australia opposes the change as potentially undermining the Commission’s independence.

The Government will need to provide far more detail about this proposal, and a much clearer indication of the case for change, than has emerged to date.

9. Migration Law Changes

In response to last year’s review of laws applying to skilled migration, the Government is proposing to introduce a new category of “short-term mobility” visas which would enable employers to bypass the subclass 457 visa scheme for certain types of foreign workers. The new visas would not be subject to language or skills requirements, and employers would not have to show that there is no Australian worker who could fill the relevant position.[11]

This proposal would form part of a broader package of changes to make the 457 visa regime easier for employers to use, although the Government is yet to announce details of its response to the September 2014 review report.

10. Workplace Health and Safety

National Transport Commission focus for 2015

Almost two-thirds of workplace deaths between 2012 and 2014 involved a vehicle.

Over the 10 years to 2012, 472 workers in the road transport sector were killed while at work and in 2012, the road transport fatality rate was 12 times the national average.

Road transport also has an injury rate significantly above other sectors with the most serious claims from body stressing and falls, which commonly cause sprains and strains of joints and muscles and fractures.

In 2015 the National Transport Commission (NTC) will focus on programs to help improve productivity growth in Australia’s transport freight sector, and improve safety on the network. The NTC and Regulators will continue their focus on road freight transport industries with a goal to reduce the numbers of fatalities and injuries in 2015.

2015 will also see further WHS legislative developments, including:

  • clarification of the proposed Work Health and Safety Bill in Western Australia following a consultation period which concluded at the end of January;
  • the South Australian Government’s response to last year’s review of that state’s model WHS legislation;
  • the likely direction of WHS reform in Victoria under the Andrews Labor Government, including whether Victoria will implement the national model WHS legislation and the future role of the Victorian WorkCover Authority.

 


 

  [1] See here.

  [2] The question whether putting forward ‘sham’ or non-genuine proposals involves a breach of good faith bargaining obligations under the current FW Act provisions is under consideration in an appeal against Senior Deputy President Hamberger’s decision in APESMA v Peabody Energy Australia Coal Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 6061 (4 September 2014).

  [3] Mathew Dunkley, “Call to keep lid on wage claims”, The Australian Financial Review, 9 January 2015.

  [4] Richard Willingham, “Major EBAs loom for Andrews government in 2015”, The Age, 8 January 2015.

  [5] United Firefighters’ Union v Country Fire Authority [2015] FCAFC 1 (8 January 2015).

  [6] Re Australian Education Union, Ex Parte Victoria (1995) 184 CLR 188.

  [7] “Vic govt scraps state building code”, Workforce, No. 19465, 22 January 2015.

  [8] Four-Yearly Review of Modern Awards [2014] FWCFB 9412 (23 December 2014).

  [9] A separate agreement covering Aurizon staff was approved recently, against objections by relevant unions, in Aurizon Operations Limited and Aurizon Network Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 550 (21 January 2015).

  [10] Letter from Commissioner Heydon to Attorney-General George Brandis, quoted here.

  [11] Joanna Mather, “Easy entry for skilled foreigners”, The Australian Financial Review, 7 January 2015.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld
Partner 

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel

Sanmina-SCI

Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.

Starwood

We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel