News & Events

New national Building Code issued and given legislative backing

Submitted By Firm: Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Contact(s): John Tuck


Anthony Forsyth

Date Published: 11/11/2013

Article Type:

Share This:

On 25 January 2013, Workplace Relations Minister Bill Shorten MP issued a new code of practice for the building and construction industry. The Building Code 2013 (Building Code) was made as a legislative instrument, replacing the National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry (which operated as a policy instrument only).

The Building Code and the accompanying Supporting Guidelines for Commonwealth Funding Entities (Supporting Guidelines) took effect on 1 February 2013. These instruments codify previously applicable procurement rules applicable to contractors and participants in the building and construction industry, aimed at ensuring they comply with federal workplace relations laws.

In this In Brief, we explain the significance of the Building Code taking the form of a legislative instrument; the scope of application and content of the Code and Supporting Guidelines; consequences of breaching the Code; and the interaction of the Code with state government building codes (which has recently become quite a significant issue in the Victorian construction industry).

Why has the Building Code been legislated?

Previously, the National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry and successive versions of the Australian Government Implementation Guidelines for the National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry had no independent legal force and were not subject to Parliamentary scrutiny. This gave governments of both political persuasions considerable flexibility to change the guidelines in order to further their policy objectives and deal with changing circumstances.

By issuing the Building Code as a legislative instrument under the Fair Work (Building Industry) Act 2012 (Cth), the Government intends to provide contractors and building industry participants with greater certainty. Because legislative instruments must be registered with and may be disallowed by Parliament, a higher level of accountability is also achieved. To that extent the legislative instrument status of the Building Code implements, in part, views expressed by Murray Wilcox QC in his Transition to Fair Work Australia for the Building and Construction Industry Report (March 2009).

It seems that another motivation of the Government in legislating the Building Code is to put it on a more sound legal footing, given the emerging conflict between the federal procurement rules and those issued by some state governments (which we discuss further below).

Who does the Building Code apply to?

Building contractors and building industry participants are subject to the Building Code if:

  • they have submitted an expression of interest or tender for Commonwealth-funded building work, including projects undertaken or funded by a federal department or agency and projects indirectly funded by a Commonwealth grant exceeding certain specified monetary amounts, prior to 1 February 2013 (this departs from the previous approach, whereby projects were subject to the version of the National Code Implementation Guidelines applicable when tenders were first called for); or
  • they submit an expression of interest or tender for Commonwealth-funded building work on or after 1 February 2013; or
  • after becoming subject to the Code in either of the above circumstances, they carry out any Commonwealth-funded or privately-funded building work.

The Building Code applies only to on-site building and construction activities, and off-site activities that relate to on-site work (e.g. building work performed on an auxiliary site).

Building contractors and building industry participants covered by the Building Code must ensure that their subcontractors are also code-compliant.

What does the Building Code require?

For the most part, the obligations imposed on contractors and building industry participants by the Building Code reflect those that were previously applicable. These include:

  • General responsibilities: e.g. proactive implementation of measures to ensure compliance with the Building Code (including by subcontractors), and notification of any alleged breaches to the Director of Fair Work Building and Construction (FWBC) within 21 days.
  • Compliance with other laws: these include the FWBI Act, the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), modern awards and enterprise agreements made under the FW Act, the Independent Contractors Act 2006 (Cth) (IC Act), and the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) to the extent that it relates to tendering or building work. Contractors and building industry participants must also comply with any decision, direction or order made by a court or tribunal that applies to them.
  • Unregistered agreements: generally, contractors and building industry participants must only bargain for or make agreements setting employment conditions under the FW Act (or other designated building laws). Unregistered written individual or collective agreements are not permitted, unless they relate to certain matters (e.g. participation in anti-bullying/harassment programs, health and well-being or environmental initiatives). Individual employment contracts between employers and employees are permitted. This still leaves unresolved, the problem that building industry participants may make oral agreements which might have the effect of undermining the intended operation of the Building Code.
  • Sham contracting: contractors and building industry participants must not engage in conduct prohibited by Part 3-1, Division 6 of the FW Act (e.g. misrepresenting employment as an independent contracting arrangement), and must not enter into a harsh or unfair service contract as defined in Part 3 of the IC Act.
  • Over-award payments, etc: contractors and subcontractors must not be coerced or pressured to make over-award payments, or to contribute to a particular redundancy or superannuation fund.
  • Freedom of association: policies must be adopted to ensure that persons (e.g. employees and subcontractors) are able to choose whether or not to be members of industrial associations, to be represented by such bodies, or to participate in lawful industrial activities. For example, ‘no ticket no start’ signs must not be displayed on work sites; employers cannot be required to employ a non-working union shop steward; and union ‘bargaining fees’ cannot be imposed on non-members. Equally, forms cannot be used to identify the union status of employees or subcontractors; and employers cannot refuse to employ, or terminate, employees because of their union status.
  • Right of entry: union entry rights under the FW Act and federal/state/territory work health and safety (WHS) laws must be observed.
  • Dispute settlement: enterprise agreements must include a genuine dispute settlement procedure, which makes provision for final arbitration of disputes by an independent third party (e.g. the Fair Work Commission).
  • Workplace reform: contractors and building industry participants must comply with the requirements of the FW Act when making enterprise agreements, including the good faith bargaining obligations. New provisions have also been introduced prohibiting the rejection of proposals in agreement negotiations on certain grounds.[1]
  • WHS and rehabilitation: implementation of a WHS and rehabilitation management system, and (where the contractor or building industry participant is the principal contractor on a site) a WHS and rehabilitation management plan which meets certain minimum requirements.
  • Security of payment: compliance with all applicable laws/requirements regarding security of payments.

Consequences of breaching the Building Code

Under the Supporting Guidelines, FWBC has the main responsibility for monitoring compliance with the Building Code by contractors and building industry participants.

The Code Monitoring Group in the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations also has a role, including making recommendations to the Minister on the sanctions applicable to parties that breach the Building Code.

Those sanctions may include precluding a party that has breached the Building Code from tendering for Commonwealth-funded work for up to six months.

How does the Building Code interact with state government codes?

Minister Shorten has indicated that the new Code “reflects the original intent of the National Code of Practice for the Construction Industry as agreed between the Federal and State Governments in 1997. That intent was to lift the behavioural standards of the industry and to secure compliance with all legal obligations and ethical tendering requirements.”[2]

Perhaps implicit in these comments is a suggestion that building codes introduced at state level have moved away from the intent of the original National Code, with some state governments seeking to use building industry procurement rules to counter the federal Government’s workplace relations policies.

Recent events in Victoria have illustrated this tension. The Victorian Government has taken steps to ensure compliance with its own Implementation Guidelines to the Victorian Code of Practice for the Building and Construction Industry (Victorian Code Implementation Guidelines) (operative from 1 July 2012; a new version was issued in December 2012). The NSW Government has also released draft Implementation Guidelines which are likely to commence operation by 1 July 2013.

Among other requirements, the Victorian Code Implementation Guidelines contain provisions prohibiting “union-friendly” clauses and clauses restricting the engagement of flexible forms of labour from being included in enterprise agreements.

The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) has brought proceedings alleging that by excluding (or threatening to exclude) certain building companies from tenders for a Victorian Government-funded building project, the Government has breached the “general protections” provisions in Part 3-1 of the FW Act.

In another proceeding, CFMEU v Eco Recyclers Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 24 (24 January 2013), Justice Bromberg of the Federal Court of Australia found that there was a prima facie case that McCorkell Constructions Pty Ltd had breached Part 3-1 by refusing to engage or make use of the services of Eco Recyclers Pty Ltd – because Eco had an enterprise agreement that did not comply with the Victorian Code Implementation Guidelines.

While both these proceedings await final determination, the federal Government has sought to directly address the conflict between the federal and state rules relating to agreement content.

This has been done through new provisions in the Building Code which provide that, in enterprise agreement negotiations, a contractor or building industry participant must not refuse to consider another bargaining representative’s proposal on the ground that a third party has indicated that:

  • it will not procure services from a person covered by an industrial instrument containing a particular type of provision(s); or
  • it will procure services only from such a person.

In practice however this is unlikely to achieve more than to add to the existing good faith bargaining obligations under the FW Act. Ultimately, the Building Code will not prevent a Building Contractor refusing to agree to include terms in a proposed collective agreement that are inconsistent with state government codes such as the Victorian Code Implementation Guidelines. Moreover, putting aside the question of any legal consequence attaching to a contractor acting adversely against a prospective subcontractor or employee in reliance on a state government Code, Building Contractors wishing to tender for state government building work would be unwise to include provisions in a collective agreement that are prohibited by a state government code such as the Victorian Code Implementation Guidelines.

What should building industry employers do next?

  • If your organisation is engaged in or tendering for any projects to which the Building Code applies, ensure that it is code-compliant in all respects.
  • Check to ensure that any subcontractors your organisation engages are code-compliant.
  • Review all project agreements, tenders and contracts (e.g. with subcontractors) for compliance with the Building Code.
  • Determine whether a state government building code applies to particular projects, and if so, whether it is possible to comply with both federal and state codes.
  • Seek advice before making decisions about the engagement of subcontractors in reliance on a state government code.

[1] See further below under heading “How does the Building Code interact with state government codes?”.

[2] Supporting Guidelines (Foreword from Minister), 1 February 2013.

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel