News & Events

Federal Government expands access to Comcare scheme

Submitted By Firm: Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Contact(s): John Tuck


By Jane Hall (Special Counsel) & Marie Costa (Associate)

Date Published: 4/7/2014

Article Type:

Share This:

On 2 December 2013, Employment Minister Senator Eric Abetz announced the lifting of a moratorium on private corporations becoming self-insurers under the Comcare scheme which had been put in place by the Rudd Labor Government in December 2007.

This was followed, on 19 March 2014, by the introduction into federal Parliament of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2014 (Bill). The main purpose of the Bill is to enable employers who operate in two or more States or Territories to apply for a licence to self-insure under Comcare. Employers which obtain such a licence will also be covered by the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) (WHS Act 2011). This would ensure that licence-holders operated under an integrated workers’ compensation and work health and safety regime.


The Comcare scheme was established under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) (SRC Act) to provide workers’ compensation and rehabilitation coverage for Commonwealth and ACT Government employees. The SRC Act was amended in 1992 to enable certain categories of non-Commonwealth corporations to self-insure under the Comcare scheme, with the consequence that their workers’ compensation arrangements were no longer regulated by State or Territory law.

Further legislative changes in 2006 enabled private corporations which were licensed to self-insure under the SRC Act also to be covered by the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1991 (Cth) (OHS Act 1991), rather than State and Territory occupational health and safety legislation.

The moratorium imposed by the Rudd Government in December 2007 had the effect that no further non-Commonwealth corporations could self-insure under Comcare, although existing licence-holders were permitted to remain in the Scheme. This moratorium remained in place until the Minister’s announcement of 2 December 2013, despite the fact that two reports commissioned by the previous government had recommended that it be lifted.

Lifting of the moratorium and changes to Comcare eligibility criteria under the Bill

The lifting of the moratorium means that companies can once again apply under section 100 of the SRC Act to be declared eligible to be granted a self-insurance licence. To be declared eligible a corporation must either:

  • be a former ‘Commonwealth authority’ (including a Commonwealth authority that is about to cease to be such an authority); or
  • pass a ’competition test‘, which requires that they be carrying on business in competition with a Commonwealth authority, or with a corporation that was previously a Commonwealth authority.[1]

Amongst the corporations which have obtained licences in reliance upon this provision are Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd, John Holland Group Pty Ltd, Linfox Australia Pty Ltd and Optus Administration Pty Ltd.

The Bill clearly contemplates that current and former Commonwealth authorities will be able to obtain licences to self-insure as at present. It also contains a number of provisions which will make it easier for non-Commonwealth corporations to self-insure under the SRC Act. They include:

  • removing the requirement for a ministerial declaration of eligibility so that in future corporations would be able to apply directly to Comcare for a licence;
  • removing the requirement that a corporation be in competition with a current or former Commonwealth authority;
  • enabling any corporation which is required to meet workers’ compensation obligations under the laws of two or more States or Territories (‘national employers’) to obtain a licence to self-insure under the SRC Act; and
  • enabling corporations which are related bodies corporate within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to obtain a ‘group licence’ to self-insure under Comcare. This is in contrast with the present arrangements which require that each entity within a corporate group must obtain a separate licence (for example, in addition to John Holland Group Pty Ltd, licences have been issued to two other corporations in the John Holland Group: John Holland Pty Ltd and John Holland Rail Pty Ltd).

In addition, the Bill proposes:

  • to extend the coverage of the WHS Act 2011 to all corporations that obtain a licence to self-insure under Comcare, thereby excluding the operation of State or Territory work health and safety laws, and ensuring that licence-holders operate within an integrated regulatory environment in relation to compensation, rehabilitation and prevention of work-related injury;
  • to remove access to compensation under Comcare where an employee’s own serious and wilful misconduct results in the employee’s death or serious and permanent impairment; and
  • also to remove access to compensation where an employee is injured during a recess break from their employment, and the injury occurs while the employee is temporarily absent from the workplace. If an injury occurs at the workplace during a recess break, an employee will still be entitled to obtain compensation.

Key points for employers

There are a number of factors that employers should consider in determining whether to seek a licence to self-insure under Comcare.

  • operating under a single work health and safety and compensation regime could be expected to give rise to significant cost-savings for employers who operate in two or more States or Territories;
  • it needs to be recognised that some State and Territory regulators possess particular expertise in certain forms of economic activity (for example, in mining and resources), and that the Commonwealth regulator may not possess similar levels of expertise. This could be a source of inconvenience in some instances;
  • it is also necessary to bear in mind that workers’ compensation costs under some State and Territory schemes may be lower than those under Comcare. This could be a particularly important factor where a corporation’s business is heavily concentrated in a State or Territory which has lower costs than the Commonwealth scheme;
  • corporations which presently meet the eligibility requirements in section 100 of the SRC Act may be inclined to press ahead with an application for a ministerial declaration and self-insurance licence. It should be borne in mind, however, that unless or until the Bill becomes law, any such corporation would continue to be subject to the work health and safety laws in each State and Territory in which it operates; and
  • corporations which do not presently meet the eligibility criteria will, of course, have to wait until the Bill becomes law. However, if and when that happens, many more corporations will be able to meet the eligibility criteria, and will be able to access the benefits of access to an integrated national system of occupational health and safety and workers’ compensation – assuming that the advantages of such access outweigh any potential disadvantages in terms of cost or regulatory inconvenience.

It is not clear whether or when the Bill will become law. Although the federal Opposition has not yet indicated whether it will support or oppose the legislation, it seems reasonable to suppose that the Labor Party would oppose passage of the Bill given its position on Comcare when in government. This suggests that the Abbott Government may have to wait until the composition of the Senate changes on 1 July 2014, although even then the Bill’s passage cannot be assured.

[1] In addition, guidelines have been issued by the SRCC which outline criteria for whether self-insurance licenses should be granted (see Australian Government, Comcare, “Guidelines – Licence Application Evaluation”, January 2006). These guidelines require employers to demonstrate that granting a licence will not be contrary to the interests of employees, and that certain prudential requirements are met so that the SRCC is satisfied appropriate funding is in place to cover workers’ compensation claims. It can be expected that these guidelines will be updated if and when the Bill becomes law.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel