News & Events

“But why?”: Fair Work Commission publishes first reasons for making stop bullying order

Submitted By Firm: Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Contact(s): John Tuck


By Janine Young (Partner), Chloe Shannon (Associate) & Professor Anthony Forsyth (Consultant)

Date Published: 8/17/2015

Article Type:

Share This:

Previous Corrs In Briefs have looked at the evolution of the Fair Work Commission (FWC)’s anti-bullying jurisdiction since its commencement on 1 January 2014.[1] In this In Brief, we consider the learnings for employers arising out of the FWC’s first published reasons for making an order to stop bullying under Part 6-4B of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act). 


During a determinative conference in the recent case of CF and NW v Company A and ED,[2] Commissioner Hampton heard that the two applicants, employees of a small real estate business, allegedly had been the subject of belittling conduct, swearing, yelling, physical intimidation and threats of violence, at the hands of a Property Manager. Following an informal investigation into the applicants’ bullying allegations and an attempted workplace mediation, the Property Manager resigned from her employment with the employer and took up an equivalent position with a related company, working from a different location. 

During the conference, the Property Manager denied she had behaved unreasonably towards the applicants and contended that the applicants themselves had acted unreasonably in certain respects.

When can the FWC make a stop bullying order?

The FWC may make an order to stop bullying if it is satisfied that a worker in a constitutionally-covered business has been bullied at work and there is a risk that the bullying will continue.[3] A worker is bullied at work when:

  • another individual or group of individuals repeatedly behaves unreasonably towards the worker; and
  • that behaviour creates a risk to health and safety.[4]

Were the applicants bullied?

The employer conceded that based on the undisputed facts, a finding of bullying could be made - i.e. there was sufficient evidence that the Property Manager had repeatedly behaved unreasonably towards the applicants and that such behaviour may have created a risk to health and safety. 

The employer also acknowledged, and the Commissioner agreed, that the Property Manager’s contrary allegations that the applicants had themselves engaged in unreasonable behaviour did not of themselves undermine a finding that the Property Manager had bullied the applicants.

Due to the employer’s concession, Commissioner Hampton was able to make a finding of bullying without having to resolve the disputed facts.  However, he went further and noted that the evidence revealed:

“a workplace culture where unprofessional and unreasonable conduct and interactions had taken place and that such had created a risk to the health and safety of a number of the workers involved.”[5]

This finding was partly based on the fact that the employer did not have any formal anti-bullying or grievance resolution procedures in place. 

Was there a risk that the bullying would continue?

Taking into account all of the circumstances, Commissioner Hampton found there was a risk the applicants would continue to be bullied by the Property Manager.  This was because:

  • although the Property Manager was employed by a different entity and worked from a different location, there was a real prospect they may have future work related interactions due to the common ownership of the businesses (in fact she had already been seconded back to her original employer in the lead-up to the FWC proceedings); and
  • without measures to set and enforce appropriate standards of behaviour in the workplace, there was a risk of further unreasonable behaviour. 

Orders to stop the bullying

Having satisfied himself that the applicants had been bullied at work and that there was a risk the bullying would continue, Commissioner Hampton made orders to stop the bullying, with the consent of all parties.

In relation to the specific behaviour complained of, the Commissioner ordered that the applicants and Property Manager not make contact with each other and not attend each other’s work premises. In relation to these orders, the Commissioner observed that:

“In some cases, an order that parties avoid each other may not be appropriate as it may have practical difficulties and may not of itself deal with the fundamental unreasonable conduct.  In this case, the (now) different employers and work locations meant that avoidance was a practical preventative solution and this was the outcome strongly supported by all parties, including the employer.”[6]

Commissioner Hampton also made orders to address his broader concerns with the culture of “unprofessional and unreasonable conduct” at the workplace, including that the employer provide anti-bullying training and an updated anti-bullying policy and complaints handling procedure to all staff. 

In making these orders, the Commissioner stated that:

“In my view, the orders, particularly those dealing [with] future workplace conduct and providing appropriate procedures to make and deal with complaints, are genuine preventative orders in the context of this workplace and are consistent with the purpose of such orders as contemplated by the [FW] Act.”[7]

The orders are to remain in force for a period of 24 months. 

De-identification of the parties

We have previously considered the FWC’s reluctance to issue orders prohibiting or restricting the publication of the identities of parties in bullying matters, and tendency to favour the principle of “open justice” in most cases.[8]

However, in CF and NW v Company A and ED, Commissioner Hampton considered that de-identification of the parties was appropriate in circumstances where:

  • all proceedings, including the determinative conference, had been conducted in private;
  • all parties supported that outcome;
  • the potential for the parties not to be identified was key to the employer’s admission of bullying and the applicants’ and Property Manager’s acceptance of that admission; and
  • finalising the matter through consent orders was desirable in order to assist the continuing working relationships between the applicants and the employer.

Learnings for employers

The FWC’s first published reasons for making stop bullying orders provide useful insights into the steps that employers should take to address bullying in the workplace, and how the tribunal is likely to deal with proven cases of bullying:

  • It is critical that employers have in place a formal anti-bullying policy and grievance resolution procedures, as well as appropriate anti-bullying training, to aid in the prevention of bullying in the workplace and deal with any instances of bullying that may surface.
  • Where bullying conduct has been substantiated, separating the complainant(s) and respondent(s) may not be sufficient to remove the risk of further bullying, if there is still potential for future work-related interactions between the disputing parties.
  • A person who complains of bullying may be the victim of bullying even if he or she has also engaged in unreasonable conduct.
  • The Commission may make orders to stop bullying beyond the scope of the specific conduct complained of, if the evidence suggests there has been repeated unreasonable behaviour which has created a risk to the health and safety of people other than the applicant or applicants. 
  • The Commission may be more likely to make an order for de-identification of the parties if the matter is dealt with in private conference and the parties have made concessions on the basis that their identities will not be published. 



Look out for another publication soon in our new “Keep it Safe” series, exploring the increasing importance of managing bullying; the diverse range of legal risks for employers in this area; and broader issues relating to mental health in the workplace.

[1] See here, here, here and here.

[2] [2015] FWC 5272 (5 August 2015).

[3] Section 789FF(1) of the FW Act.

[4] Section 789FD(1) of the FW Act.

[5] [2015] FWC 5272 at [20].

[6] [2015] FWC 5272 at [31].

[7] [2015] FWC 5272 at [34].

[8] See here.


Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel