News & Events

An uncertain future for the government’s paid parental leave scheme

Submitted By Firm: Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Contact(s): John Tuck


By Nick Le Mare (Partner), Georgina North (Senior Associate) & Marissa Dooris (Graduate Lawyer)

Date Published: 6/12/2014

Article Type:

Share This:

A number of key details of the government’s proposed paid parental leave (PPL) scheme are unclear, creating uncertainty for employers. The fate of the scheme is also unclear in light of the Budget and the soon to be changed composition of the Senate.


In August 2013, the Coalition (then in opposition) proposed a Paid Parental Leave (PPL) scheme to take effect from 1 July 2015. A number of components of the PPL have been changed by the now government since it was first proposed. The terms of the proposed PPL as it now stands and a comparison with the current PPL scheme is set out below:



Proposed scheme

Current scheme

Primary entitlement

26 weeks paid leave for the primary carer at their actual wage or the national minimum wage (whichever is greater), with payments capped at $50,000.

18 weeks paid leave at the national minimum wage.


All workers (including casual, seasonal, contract and self-employed workers) who have worked for at least 10 out of the 13 months prior to the birth or adoption and at least 330 hours in that 10 month period (just over one day a week), with not more than an eight week gap in work.

The same eligibility criteria apply, except those who earn over $150,000 are excluded from the scheme.


Secondary entitlement

Two weeks paid leave for secondary carers at their actual wage or the national minimum wage (whichever is greater), with payments capped in line with the primary carer’s salary and the leave deducted from the primary carer’s leave.

Two weeks paid leave at the national minimum wage, in addition to the primary carer’s leave.


Payments made and administered via the Department of Human Services (DHS), not employers.

Payments under the current scheme made via employers following a determination of employee’s eligibility by DHS.


Superannuation contributions at the mandatory rate to be made on PPL payments to primary and secondary carers.

No provision for super contributions for carers on PPL.

The government has said that the PPL scheme will be funded by a 1.5% levy on companies with an annual taxable income greater than $5 million. The imposition of this levy is intended to coincide with the proposed 1.5% reduction in corporate tax rate, thereby making the levy “revenue neutral” for an interim period. There has been debate about whether or not the levy will be sufficient to cover the actual cost of the scheme. We can expect further information and debate about this in due course.


Some of the detail of the scheme remains unclear, including:

  • Its relationship with existing employer PPL schemes: it has been reported that the government plans to use the social services power in the Constitution to implement the scheme. COAG agreed in principle that State public sector employees will be covered by the scheme but arrangements with the States have yet to be finalised. The government has said that employees will be prevented from “double dipping”[1], however it is unclear how the scheme will impact on more generous PPL entitlements in industrial agreements or employer policies in the private sector.
  • How “income” will be calculated: the premise of the scheme is income replacement. It may be difficult to calculate the “income” of some eligible workers who do not have a defined or stable salary, such as contractors, the self-employed or workers who rely on at risk bonuses or commissions.
  • Who will pay superannuation: it is unclear whether the government or employers will be responsible for making superannuation contributions on payments made under the scheme.
  • Which businesses will pay the PPL levy: it is unclear whether the levy will apply to businesses such as partnerships and not-for-profit associations.

Political hurdles

The government can be expected to face challenges in the Senate when negotiating passage of the legislation to introduce the scheme.

Labor has indicated it will not support any changes to the current scheme. Although the Greens are supportive of the government’s current proposal (with payments capped at $50,000), they have indicated that they are not likely to back it unless changes are introduced to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) that link PPL to the entitlement to take parental leave and strengthen the right for mothers to return to work on flexible arrangements.

One Liberal backbencher recently described the scheme as friendless and a number of Coalition Senators have indicated they would vote against it. Nationals Senator John Williams has proposed an alternative scheme to extend the current 18 weeks PPL at the minimum wage to 26 weeks, plus super.

Although Clive Palmer of the Palmer United Party previously indicated opposition to the scheme, he has said more recently that his party may be willing to support Senator Williams’ proposal if it is extended to all Australians (not just working parents). This amendment would change the nature of the scheme from a workplace entitlement to a form of “baby bonus”.

what does this mean for employers?

The uncertain fate of the scheme and the lack of clarity about its detail creates uncertainty for employers.

Until further information is known, employers are unable to properly consider the impact of the proposed scheme on their own PPL arrangements and in particular, whether changes to their own arrangements ought to be made.

Prime Minister Abbott’s enthusiasm for the scheme has generated a great deal of discussion and debate about PPL as a workplace entitlement. In circumstances where passage of the scheme is unsuccessful, employers may find there is an increasing expectation among employees for enhanced employer-funded PPL programs.


Both Houses of Parliament are sitting between 16 June 2014 and 26 June 2014. It is unclear whether a proposed Bill will be introduced during this period. As at 11 June 2014, Treasury is still considering tax implications of the levy.[2] We will provide a further update when more information is known.

[1] Joanne Mather and Matthew Dunckley, “Government releases PPL scheme details”, Australian Financial Review, 23 January 2014, p 7.

[2] Fleur Anderson & Laura Tingle, “Tax issue holds draft law back”, Australian Financial Review, 11 June 2014, p 7.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel