News & Events

ERISA Spring Cleaning - Have You Properly Identified All of Your ERISA Benefits?

Submitted By Firm: Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

Contact(s): Louis P. DiLorenzo, Thomas G. Eron


Date Published: 5/6/2016

Article Type:

Share This:

Why Is It Important To Properly Identify All of Your ERISA Benefits?

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") imposes numerous requirements on covered employee benefit plans, including annual report requirements (i.e., a Form 5500 series report) that could result in substantial monetary penalties for an employer if violated. Depending upon the type of ERISA plan involved, those penalties could include:

  • a United States Department of Labor ("DOL") penalty of up to $1,100 a day (the DOL has announced that if certain requirements are satisfied, the applicable penalty will not exceed $30,000 per year per plan); and/or
  • an Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") penalty of up to $15,000 for a late Form 5500 for certain retirement plans, trusts and annuities, and smaller IRS penalty amounts if certain related forms are not timely filed.

What Are Some of the More Common Errors Made By Employers When Identifying Their ERISA Benefits?

Among the more common errors made by ERISA-covered employers when identifying their ERISA benefits are the following:

  • Business Travel Accident Plans – a business travel accident plan generally is subject to ERISA;
  • Employee Assistance Plans – an employee assistance plan that provides counseling services, or other services that are not publicly available and that meet certain requirements, could be subject to ERISA;
  • Insured Short-Term Disability Plans That Provide More Than the Statutory Minimum – an insured short-term disability plan that provides benefits in excess of those required by state law generally will be subject to ERISA;
  • Severance Benefits Provided To Employees Pursuant To a Formula – severance benefits that an employer provides to employees pursuant to a formula, even if it is unwritten, could be subject to ERISA; and
  • Deferred Compensation Agreements – a deferred compensation agreement for an employee generally will be subject to ERISA.

What Are the General Types of Plans Subject to ERISA?

The employee benefit requirements in ERISA generally apply to the following types of benefit plans:

  • Employee Pension Benefit Plans – an employee pension plan is defined, in part, as any plan, fund, or program which (1) provides retirement income to employees, or (2) results in a deferral of income by employees for periods extending to the termination of covered employment or beyond; and
  • Employee Welfare Benefit Plan – an employee welfare benefit plan is defined, in part, as any plan, fund, or program that provides:

1. medical, surgical, or hospital care benefits, benefits in the event of sickness, accident, disability, death or unemployment, vacation benefits, apprenticeship or other training programs, daycare centers, scholarship funds, or prepaid legal services; or

2. any benefit described in Section 302(c) of the Labor Management Relations Act, other than pensions on retirement or death and insurance to provide such pensions (this provision adds, among other things, holiday, severance, and similar benefits).

Are Certain Types of Plans Totally Exempt From ERISA?

There are several statutory, regulatory, and case law exemptions that totally exempt certain plans from ERISA coverage. Among the more important of these exemptions are the following:

  • Government Plans – a statutory exemption from ERISA exists for plans maintained by the United States government, the government of a state or political subdivision of a state, or any agency or instrumentality of the foregoing;
  • Certain Church Plans – a church plan can be exempt from ERISA if it satisfies certain requirements;
  • Certain Workers’ Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and Disability Plans – plans maintained solely for the purpose of complying with applicable workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, or disability insurance laws will be exempt from ERISA (this ERISA exemption has been construed very narrowly by the DOL, and if a plan provides any benefit in addition to what is necessary solely to comply with the applicable workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, or disability insurance law, the plan may not qualify for this exemption);
  • Certain Group or Group-Type Insurance Programs – a group or group-type insurance program offered by an insurer to employees will be exempt from ERISA if the following requirements are satisfied:

1. no contributions are made by the employer;

2. participation in the program is completely voluntary for employees;

3. the sole functions of the employer with respect to the program are, without endorsing the program, to permit the insurer to publicize the program to employees, to collect premiums through payroll deductions, and to remit them to the insurer (the DOL has strictly interpreted this "no endorsement" requirement, and employers need to be very careful about any documentation that suggests that the program is an employer program); and

4. the employer receives no consideration in the form of cash or otherwise in connection with the program, other than reasonable compensation (excluding any profit) for administrative services actually rendered in connection with payroll deductions.

  • Certain Other Regulatory Exemptions – the ERISA regulations also include complete exemptions from ERISA coverage for:

1. certain payroll practices;

2. certain holiday gifts;

3. certain remembrance funds;

4. unfunded scholarship programs;

5. certain on-premises facilities;

6. certain sales to employees; and

7. certain payroll savings plans.

  • Case Law Exemption for "Fort Halifax" Arrangements – a "Fort Halifax" arrangement is a case law exemption that generally (1) provides for a lump sum payment or payments made over a short period of time (e.g., one court allowed payments over six months), and (2) does not create a need for an ongoing administrative program for processing claims and/or paying benefits.

What Are Some of the More Common Benefit Arrangements That Are Potentially Subject To ERISA’s Form 5500 Annual Reporting Requirement?

Listed below are some of the more common benefit arrangements for active and/or retired employees that are potentially subject to the Form 5500 annual reporting requirement under ERISA:

  • qualified retirement plans (e.g., 401(k) plans, profit sharing plans, and defined benefit plans);
  • medical benefit plans (including plans providing solely for physical examinations);
  • dental benefit plans;
  • prescription drug plans;
  • vision care plans;
  • certain cafeteria plans (for example, if the plan has health flexible spending accounts);
  • certain long-term disability plans;
  • certain short-term disability plans;
  • certain severance plans;
  • life insurance plans;
  • accidental death and dismemberment plans;
  • long-term care insurance plans;
  • business travel accident plans;
  • legal services plans;
  • certain employee assistance plans (for example, if the plan provides counseling services, or provides certain other services that are not publicly available and that meet certain requirements);
  • certain bonus programs (for example, if bonus payments are systematically deferred until termination of employment or beyond);
  • supplemental unemployment benefit plans;
  • certain remembrance funds;
  • certain vacation pay plans (e.g., if the plan is funded);
  • certain scholarship plans (e.g., if a scholarship plan is funded);
  • certain holiday pay (e.g., if a holiday pay plan is funded);
  • apprenticeship or training programs (for example, if the applicable initial filing requirement is not satisfied);
  • certain "top hat" pension plans or agreements, if the required "top hat" pension plan filing was not made with the DOL within 120 days after the date the plan or agreement was established;
  • "golden parachute" plans; and
  • voluntary employees’ beneficiary associations ("VEBAs") that provide ERISA benefits that are not separately administered.

What Should Be Done Once the Benefits Subject to ERISA Have Been Identified?

Once the benefits that are subject to ERISA have been identified, an analysis should be made as to which of the ERISA requirements apply to such benefits. Such requirements could include, among other things, ERISA’s plan document, summary plan description, summary of material modifications, annual report, benefit claims procedure, bond, and fiduciary requirements. The analysis of the applicable ERISA requirements should include a review of ERISA’s regulatory exemptions, as such exemptions could make it unnecessary to comply with at least some of the ERISA requirements.

The ERISA requirement that often creates the most financial exposure for an employer is the failure to file an annual report (i.e., a Form 5500 series report) for an ERISA-covered benefit. Among the more helpful regulatory exemptions that have exempted ERISA benefits from the need to file a Form 5500 or other annual report are the following:

  • Exemption for Certain Plans With Fewer Than 100 Participants – Welfare benefit plans satisfying each of the following three requirements will be exempt from, among other things, the requirement to file a Form 5500 or other annual report:

1. the plan has fewer than 100 participants at the beginning of the plan year;

2. plan benefits are:

(a) paid as needed solely from the general assets of the employer maintaining the plan;

(b) provided exclusively through insurance contracts or policies issued by an insurance company or similar organization which is qualified to do business in any state or through a qualified federal health maintenance organization, the premiums for which are paid directly by the employer from its general assets or partly from its general assets and partly from contributions by its employees (provided that contributions by participants are forwarded by the employer within three months of receipt); or

(c) both; and

3. in the case of an insured plan:

(a) refunds, to which contributing participants are entitled, are returned to them within three months of receipt by the employer; and

(b) contributing participants are informed upon entry into the plan of the provisions of the plan concerning the allocation of refunds.

  • "Top Hat" Pension Plan Exemption – A "top hat" pension plan is an unfunded pension plan or agreement that is maintained by an employer primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees. A "top hat" pension plan or agreement will be exempt from, among other things, the requirement to file a Form 5500 or other annual report if the employer files with the DOL a "top hat" pension plan letter containing certain information within 120 days after the date such plan or agreement was established.
  • "Top Hat" Welfare Plan Exemption – Welfare benefit plans satisfying the requirements set forth below (commonly referred to as "top hat" welfare benefit plans) will be exempt from, among other things, the requirement to file a Form 5500 or other annual report if:

1. the plan is maintained by an employer primarily for the purpose of providing welfare benefits for a select group of management or highly compensated employees; and

2. plan benefits:

(a) are paid as needed solely from the general assets of the employer;

(b) are provided exclusively through insurance contracts or policies, the premiums for which are paid directly by the employer from its general assets, issued by an insurance company or similar organization which is qualified to do business in any state; or

(c) both.

If a Required Form 5500 Has Not Been Filed For An ERISA Benefit, What Should Be Done?

If an employer discovers that it has not filed a required Form 5500 for an ERISA benefit, the potential monetary penalties to the DOL and/or the IRS can be expensive depending upon the type of plan and the number of years involved. Fortunately, the DOL, the IRS and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") have developed voluntary compliance programs or procedures that will allow an eligible plan administrator to substantially reduce the potential penalties for a late Form 5500, as long as the eligible plan administrator has not been notified in writing by the applicable government agency that there has been a failure to timely file a Form 5500. These programs and procedures include the following:

  • DOL’s Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program – The DOL developed the Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Program ("DFVC Program") in order to make it easier and less costly for eligible plan administrators to voluntarily file late Forms 5500 for retirement plans and welfare benefit plans covered by ERISA. The DFVC Program includes the following reduced penalty amounts: (1) a reduced "per filing" cap (i.e., the maximum penalty for a single late Form 5500 or other annual report) of $750 for small plans, and $2,000 for large plans; (2) a "per plan" cap that limits the penalty to $1,500 for a small plan and $4,000 for a large plan, regardless of the number of late Forms 5500 or other annual reports filed for the plan at the same time; (3) a reduced penalty of $750 for "top hat" pension plans; and (4) a special "per plan" cap of $750 for certain small plans sponsored by an organization that is exempt from tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
  • IRS Filing For Tax-Qualified Retirement Plans – If a plan administrator has not timely filed a Form 5500 for a tax-qualified retirement plan, an IRS Form 8955-SSA (Annual Registration Statement Identifying Separated Participants With Deferred Vested Benefits) must be filed for the applicable year in accordance with the requirements of IRS Notice 2014-35 in order to be eligible for certain IRS penalty relief. This filing does not have to be made for welfare benefit plans. The IRS also will provide certain other penalty relief if the requirements of the DFVC Program have been satisfied.
  • PBGC Relief – The PBGC has agreed to provide certain penalty relief for a plan administrator for failure to timely file a Form 5500 where the conditions of the DFVC Program have been satisfied.

Employers that have properly identified all of their ERISA benefits and identified any late Forms 5500 or other annual reports can substantially reduce the potential penalties by taking advantage of these filing relief programs and procedures.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel