News & Events

A Major Curtailment of the IRS Determination Letter Program Will Impose New ComplianceBurdens on Sponsoring Employers

Submitted By Firm: Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC

Contact(s): Louis P. DiLorenzo, Thomas G. Eron


Date Published: 7/28/2015

Article Type:

Share This:

The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") announced, on July 21, 2015, a major curtailment of its determination letter program for individually designed qualified retirement plans ("Individually Designed Plans") that will impose significant new compliance burdens on employers and other entities that sponsor Individually Designed Plans ("Sponsors"). Such determination letters inform Sponsors that the language in their Individually Designed Plans satisfies the applicable qualification requirements of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code"), and have been relied on by Sponsors for more than sixty years. The new changes to the IRS determination letter program, described in IRS Announcement 2015-19, will, among other things:

  • eliminate the staggered 5-year determination letter remedial amendment cycles for Individually Designed Plans; and
  • generally restrict the issuance of IRS determination letters for Individually Designed Plans to a request for an initial plan qualification, and to a request for a qualification determination when a plan terminates (the IRS also indicated that there could be "other limited circumstances" when such a letter might be issued, but it is unclear what those circumstances might be).

These changes will make it much more difficult for Sponsors to know that the language in their Individually Designed Plans satisfies applicable Code requirements, and will significantly increase the legal exposure of Sponsors with respect to such language. There are several steps Sponsors should take to address such increased exposure, including making sure that they have procedures in place requiring the language in their Individually Designed Plans to be reviewed periodically (no less frequently than annually) to ensure that all required amendments are timely and properly made.

When Are These Changes Effective?

The changes to the IRS’s determination letter program for Individually Designed Plans will be effective on the following dates:

  • Starting on July 21, 2015, Applications For Most Off-Cycle Determination Letters Will No Longer Be Accepted – In its announcement on July 21, 2015, the IRS said it was immediately (i.e., effective as of July 21, 2015) eliminating the ability of a Sponsor to apply for an off-cycle determination letter (i.e., a determination letter application that is submitted at a time other than during the last 12-month period of a plan’s 5-year remedial amendment cycle) for an Individually Designed Plan, except as provided in the following sentence. An off-cycle determination letter application for an Individually Designed Plan can still be submitted from July 21, 2015 through December 31, 2016 for (1) new plans, and (2) terminating plans.
  • The Staggered 5-Year Remedial Amendment Cycles Generally Will Be Eliminated On January 1, 2017 – In 2007, the IRS established staggered 5-year remedial amendment cycles for Individually Designed Plans that generally allow Sponsors to apply for determination letters once every five years. Starting on January 1, 2017, these staggered 5-year remedial amendment cycles for Individually Designed Plans generally will be eliminated. As an exception to the preceding sentence, Sponsors of Cycle A plans in the 5-year remedial amendment cycle will still be allowed to submit determination letter applications from February 1, 2016 to January 31, 2017.
  • Starting On January 1, 2017, Determination Applications For Individually Designed Plans Generally Will Be Limited To Initial Plan Qualifications, Qualifications Upon Plan Termination, and "Certain Other Limited Circumstances" – When the staggered 5-year remedial amendment cycles generally expire on January 1, 2017, Sponsors of Individually Designed Plans who wish to obtain a determination letter on the qualified (i.e., tax-favored) status of the language in such Plans generally will only be able to do so in one of the following three circumstances: (1) for a qualification determination letter on an initial plan qualification (which is defined as an Individually Designed Plan for which an IRS Form 5300, Application for Determination for Employee Benefit Plan, has not been filed with the IRS, or for which an IRS Form 5300 was previously filed with the IRS but no determination letter was ever issued); (2) for a qualification determination letter when a plan is being terminated; and (3) for a qualification determination letter "in certain other limited circumstances" that may be determined by the United States Treasury Department and the IRS from time to time (it is not clear what those circumstances might be, or when they might be announced).

Why Did the IRS Make These Changes?

The IRS’s budget has been significantly reduced in recent years, and the IRS concluded that it had no choice but to substantially curtail its determination letter program for Individually Designed Plans in order to enable it to "more efficiently direct its limited resources."

Are Changes Being Made To the Determination Letter Programs For Prototype and Volume-Submitter Plans?

The IRS has not announced any changes to the determination letter programs for prototype and volume-submitter plans, and clearly is hoping that more sponsors of qualified retirement plans will start to use such pre-approved plans, as opposed to Individually Designed Plans. However, many Sponsors of Individually Designed Plans will have difficulty converting their Individually Designed Plans to a pre-approved prototype plan or volume-submitter plan, as the options available under a prototype plan or a volume-submitter plan often are not flexible enough to include special design features that an Individually Designed Plan may have.

Is the IRS Considering Other Changes To Assist Sponsors of Qualified Retirement Plans?

The IRS said that it is considering other changes to try to assist sponsors of qualified retirement plans, including:

  • providing IRS model amendments that could be used by sponsors of qualified retirement plans;
  • allowing sponsors of qualified retirement plans to not adopt certain plan provisions or amendments if they are not relevant to a particular plan; and
  • making it easier for sponsors of qualified retirement plans to incorporate by reference into their plan documents certain Code qualification requirements.

The IRS also asked for comments on whether changes should be made to the current requirements for interim amendments, the steps required to convert an Individually Designed Plan to a pre-approved prototype or volume-submitter plan, and the requirements for correcting qualified retirement plan errors under the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System. Depending on what future changes are ultimately approved, they could make it easier for Sponsors of Individually Designed Plans to comply with the changes to the determination letter program.

What Steps Should Sponsors of Individually Designed Plans Take As a Result of These Determination Letter Program Changes?

Steps that Sponsors of Individually Designed Plans should take to help address the issues raised by the changes to the determination letter program include the following:

  • Review the Latest Determination Letter Issued For the Individually Designed Plan, and Determine Whether There is Another Determination Letter Submission Deadline Before the 5-Year Remedial Amendment Cycles Expire – A Sponsor of an Individually Designed Plan should review the latest determination letter issued by the IRS with respect to that plan, and should determine whether there is another IRS determination letter submission deadline for that Plan prior to the general expiration of the staggered 5-year remedial amendment cycles on January 1, 2017. If there is another such deadline (e.g., if the Individually Designed Plan is a Cycle A plan, or if the Individually Designed Plan satisfies certain other requirements), the Sponsor should take advantage of that opportunity and request an additional determination letter for that Individually Designed Plan.
  • Make Sure the Individually Designed Plan is Reviewed Periodically For Any Required Plan Amendments – If not already in place, procedures should be implemented to ensure that an Individually Designed Plan is reviewed periodically to ensure that any amendments required by the Code or IRS guidance are timely and properly done. Such periodic review should occur no less frequently than annually. Apart from these plan language compliance issues, Sponsors should also make sure their Individually Designed Plans are administered in accordance with all applicable Code, IRS and other legal requirements.
  • Consideration Should Be Given To Whether the Individually Designed Plan Can Be Converted to a Prototype or Volume-Submitter Plan – Each Sponsor of an Individually Designed Plan should analyze whether it is feasible to convert the Individually Designed Plan to a pre-approved prototype or volume-submitter plan. Although the special design features in many Individually Designed Plans will make any such conversion hard to achieve, there may be some Individually Designed Plans that could make such a conversion with relatively few design modifications.
  • Identify Situations Where a Determination Letter Might Be Needed, and Consider Alternatives For Addressing That Need – Sponsors of Individually Designed Plans should identify situations where a determination letter may be needed or requested, and should consider what alternatives might be available to help address such a need or request. Examples of such a need or request are certain types of business transactions (e.g., determination letters are often requested as part of a due diligence investigation in a business acquisition or merger, and a party in such a transaction often will be required to make representations about the qualified status of its qualified retirement plans), certain plan audits (e.g., some auditors ask for a copy of the latest IRS determination letter), and plan rollovers (information regarding a plan’s qualified status is sometimes requested when benefits are being rolled over). Sponsors should review the options available to address such needs or requests, and determine how best to address them.

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel