News & Events

Response to the Ending the Employment Relationship consultation

Submitted By Firm: Addleshaw Goddard

Contact(s): Michael Leftley, Sarah Harrop


Amanda Steadman

Date Published: 2/11/2013

Article Type:

Share This:

The Government has recently published its response to the Ending the Employment Relationship consultation which closed in November 2012.  The Response confirms that: (i) a new system of pre-termination settlement discussions will come into force this Summer and will be supported by a statutory ACAS Code of Practice, optional template documentation and non-statutory guidance; and (ii) the compensatory award for unfair dismissal claims will be capped at the lower of 12 months’ pay or the current overall cap (£74,300 as of 1 February 2013).  In future, the calculation of loss for unfair dismissal awards will also exclude the value of employer’s pension contributions, benefits in kind and discretionary bonuses


The Ending the Employment Relationship consultation, which closed on 23 November 2012, sought views on the nature of the guidance needed to support the provision in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill that pre-termination settlement discussions will be inadmissible in unfair dismissal proceedings.  In particular, views were sought on the proposed content of a new statutory ACAS Code of Practice and whether template settlement offer letters and a template settlement agreement should be put in place.

The consultation also sought views on proposals to vary the maximum compensatory award in unfair dismissal claims. 


Guidance to support new system of settlement discussions

New statutory ACAS Code of Practice (the Code)

It is intended that the Code will set out the following broad principles to underpin the new system of settlement discussions:

  • Either party may propose settlement.
  • The reason for offering settlement should be made clear.
  • Settlement offers are to be in writing, set out what is being offered and what the next steps will be if the offer is not accepted.
  • There is no need to have followed any procedure prior to making an offer.
  • If settlement discussions are handled the wrong way, there is a risk of constructive dismissal.
  • Individuals are to be given a clear, reasonable period of time to respond to an offer.
  • Examples are to be given of what constitutes “improper behaviour”.
  • No “undue pressure” should be put on a party to accept an offer.
  • The employer should not make any discriminatory comments or act in a discriminatory way when making a settlement offer.

Approximately 70% of respondents to the consultation agreed that the principles identified were appropriate. However, there was some concern that the absence of a requirement to follow any particular process before making an offer may undermine good management practice.  The Response confirms, however, that the Government is reluctant to make the Code too prescriptive.  Instead, the accompanying non-statutory guidance will explain how the use of settlement agreements sits within broader good management practices and the type of good practice it is expected businesses will adopt.

Another concern cited by employers’ representatives was that the principle that either party could offer settlement might encourage employees who were intending to resign to propose a settlement in the hope of eliciting a settlement payment.   The Response confirms that it is important to maintain “balance and flexibility” and allow either party to commence the process.  It is noted, however, that where an employee makes a settlement offer, the employer will be protected by the provision that any “improper behaviour” by the employee would mean that the offer would be admissible as evidence in any subsequent claim.  An example of an employee behaving improperly would be where the employee requests settlement and implies that unless the employer agrees they will underperform at work. 

More generally, the Response confirms that the Government intends the Code to support, and not stifle, the ways in which settlement agreements already work and that employers will be able to depart from the underlying principles of good practice where there are sensible reasons to do so.  The Response also confirms that there will be no direct financial penalty for parties who breach the Code.

The draft Code is to be published shortly and will be the subject of a public consultation. 

Template settlement documentation

There was broad support for the inclusion of template documentation in the new Code, although employers were concerned that these documents should not be overly prescriptive.  The Government has decided to include template settlement offer letters in the Code, although it is stressed that the use of these templates is optional and may be amended to suit the particular circumstances.

The Consultation had originally suggested that the template settlement agreement would be annexed to the Code.  However, the Government has elected to keep this with the non-statutory guidance in order that it can be easily updated to reflect any legislative changes.

Non-statutory guidance

Additional non-statutory guidance to supplement the Code will also be developed.  The guidance will explain the practical implications of the new provisions.  This will cover issues such as:

  • The admissibility of settlement offers in multiple claims. 
  • How the rule on inadmissibility applies, and what information will become admissible when an individual asserts that an element of the process has constituted improper behaviour. 
  • How the inadmissibility measure fits with the common law without prejudice regime. 
  • The implications for potential constructive dismissal claims.

The consultation also sought views on whether the guidance should include a guideline tariff (setting out what a fair and appropriate settlement figure would be).  Fifty eight percent of respondents thought that a guideline tariff would not be helpful and might impede settlement negotiations.  Accordingly, the Government has decided not to introduce a guideline tariff, although there will be guidance as to the considerations that may be taken into account when negotiating and deciding settlement figures.

The Government is working towards putting the new settlement discussion regime and accompanying Code and guidance in place by summer 2013.

Unfair dismissal compensatory award

A significant majority of employer respondents felt that a new pay-based cap would help adjust unrealistic expectations amongst claimants, lead to the earlier resolution of disputes and increase certainty on the costs of a dispute.

The Government will, therefore, introduce a new 12 months’ pay cap - subject to the overall cap - on the compensatory award for unfair dismissal.  The new cap will reflect the practice on the ground in Employment Tribunals, which rarely order compensatory awards in excess of 12 months’ loss. 

In addition, the calculation of 12 months’ pay for the purposes of the new cap will use the definition of a “week’s pay” contained in the Employment Rights Act 1996.  This means that claimants will no longer be entitled to recover the value of employer’s pension contributions, benefits in kind or discretionary bonuses.

As to the level of the overall cap, there was no consensus from respondents on whether it should be adjusted and, if so, to what level.  As a result, the Government has decided not to change the overall cap on the compensatory award “at this time”.  On 1 February 2013, the maximum compensatory award will rise from £72,300 to £74,300.

It is anticipated that the changes to the compensatory award will come into force in Summer 2013.


The introduction of the new system of "off the record" settlement discussions and offers will be welcomed by employers.  However, it is worth remembering that the protection afforded here is very limited and discussions / offers will be inadmissible in ordinary unfair claims only.  The fact and content of such discussions could find their way into other types of proceedings (e.g. wrongful dismissal claim).  Employers who do rely on the new system will need to review the new ACAS Code and guidance carefully to ensure they are acting appropriately and acquire the protection.

The adjustment of the compensatory award is good news for employers who will be able to calculate with more certainty the potential value of an unfair dismissal claim.

Response to Consultation on Ending the Employment Relationship

Find an Employment Lawyer

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel


Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.


We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel