News & Events

Gender pay gap reporting: further details of new regime published

Submitted By Firm: Addleshaw Goddard

Contact(s): Michael Leftley, Sarah Harrop

Author(s):

Amanda Steadman

Date Published: 5/5/2016

Article Type:

Share This:

The Government has published its response to the consultation on the principles which will underpin the new gender pay gap reporting regime. Employers with 250 or more employees will have to publish: (i) mean and median overall pay gap figures (including bonus, commission, LTIPs and the cash value of shares); and (ii) mean bonus gap figures on an annual basis. In addition, affected employers must also publish the numbers of men and women paid across salary quartiles within their business and the proportion of men and women who received a bonus payment within a 12-month period. The response confirms that the regulations are likely to come into force on 1 October 2016, with a first reporting date of not later than 1 April 2018. A further consultation covering the details of the draft regulations has also been published and will close on 11 March 2016.

 

The Government’s response to the Closing the Gender Pay Consultation (Consultation) was published on 12 February 2016. For more information about the Consultation you can read our detailed report here. We report below on the conclusions set out in the response paper (Response), and the draft Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2016, which clarify how the gender pay gap reporting regime will operate.

Who will be covered by the gender pay gap reporting regulations?

Employers

The Response confirms that the new pay transparency regulations will be made under section 78 of the Equality Act 2010 and will apply to employers with at least 250 "employees" in Great Britain. This threshold means that approximately 7,960 employers, employing 34% of the total workforce, will be covered by the new rules. The Government may review this threshold 5 years after the commencement of the regulations.

All employers with 250 or more employees will be required to comply with the regulations once they are introduced. There is to be no phased introduction with larger employers going first.

Employees

For the purposes of the regulations, "employee" is defined as someone who ordinarily works in Great Britain and whose contract of employment is governed by UK legislation. The Consultation had suggested that a wider definition of employment would apply and that the regulations would cover those employed under a contract of employment or apprenticeship or a contract personally to do work. In other words, employees, workers and self-employed individuals provided that their contract obliges them to perform the work personally (i.e. they cannot subcontract or employ their own staff to do it).

The wording of the draft regulations is not clear on whether the wider definition of employment is intended to apply. However, the Government Equalities Office confirmed to Addleshaw Goddard on 24 February 2016 that it remained the Government's intention that the wider definition will apply. This will mean that a wider pool of people will be caught by the regulations, for example, LLP members will be covered.

When will gender pay gap reporting come into force?

The Government had originally intended to introduce the pay transparency regulations by the end of March 2016. The Response confirms that the regulations are likely to come into force on 1 October 2016.

The regulations will require employers to produce a preliminary “data snapshot” within 6 months of the regulations coming into force. The first publication of the pay gap figures must take place within 18 months of the regulations coming into force, with annual publication thereafter.

This translates to the following timetable:

  • 1 October: gender pay gap regulations in force.
  • 30 April 2017: employer must have produced a preliminary data snapshot
  • 30 April 2018: employer must have publicly reported their gender pay gap information. This can be published on a date of the employer's choosing, provided it is done by 30 April 2018.

What gender pay comparisons have to be made?

The Response confirms that employers must “separately analyse” pay gap calculations for

  • pay; and
  • bonus payments made in a 12-month period (only those employees who have received bonus payments should be included in this calculation).

The requirement to report on bonus pay is designed to tackle the existence of the “gender bonus pay gap”. This aspect of the new rules will have the greatest impact on the financial services sector. In 2009 the Equality and Human Rights Commission conducted an inquiry into the gender pay gap in the finance sector and reported that the gender pay gap for annual gross earnings (i.e. all earnings) in the sector stood at 60% and in the majority of cases the gap for discretionary performance-related pay stood at 45% or more.

What is “pay”?

The draft regulations provide that “pay” includes: basic pay; paid leave; maternity pay; sick pay; area allowances; shift premium pay; bonus pay and other pay (including car allowances, standby / on call allowances, clothing allowances, first aider and fire warden allowances).

However, pay does not include: overtime pay; expenses; the value of salary sacrifice schemes; benefits in kind redundancy pay; arrears of pay and tax credits.

Pay must be calculated before deductions for PAYE, NICs, pensions, student loan repayments and any voluntary deductions.

What is “bonus pay”?

The draft regulations provide that “bonus” includes:

  • profit-sharing, productivity, performance and other bonus or incentive pay, piecework and commission;
  • long-term incentive plans or schemes (including those dependent on company and personal performance); and
  • the cash equivalent value of shares on the date of payment.

How should the gender pay and bonus gap figures be calculated?

The Response confirms that employers will be required to calculate the gender pay gap figure in two ways.

  • Median figure comparison: the median figure is the middle pay figure where half earn more and half earn less. The Government considers this is the best representation of the “typical” difference as it is unaffected by very high earners. This approach is also consistent with how the UK’s overall gender pay gap is calculated.
  • Mean figure comparison: the mean pay figure is the average pay figure (i.e. all pay added together and then divided by the number of employees)

The view is that the publishing both median and mean comparisons will provide greater depth to the analysis.

By contrast, the gender bonus pay gap must be produced by reference to the mean figure only.

Will gender pay and bonus gap figures have to be broken down according to hours of work?

The Consultation had sought views on whether the gender pay gap figure should be broken down by full-time and part-time status. The Response confirms that whilst calculating separate gender pay gap figures for full-time and part-time employers would provide useful information where an employer has a large part-time workforce, this approach may not be appropriate for many employers. Accordingly, there will be no obligation to break down pay gap figures in this way.

However, some employers may voluntarily choose to break the figures down in this way given that the gender pay gap figures for full-time and part-time workers are likely to be lower when looked at in isolation.

By way of example, the UK’s gender pay gap for all employees is 19.1%. The numbers of men and women in employment are broadly comparable (13.2 million male employees and 12.9 million female employees in 2014). However, a much higher proportion of women work part-time (12% of male employees and 41% of female employees). When broken down by hours, the UK’s gender pay gap is 9.4% for full-time employees and -5.5% for part-time employees (i.e. there is a negative gender pay gap for part-time employees). This means that women working part time are, in fact, paid more than their male equivalents on average. The reason why the UK’s overall gender pay gap stands at 19.1% is because there is a far higher proportion of women performing part-time work which is typically much lower paid (£8.44 per hour for a part-time female employee against £13.59 per hour for a full time male employee). It is this that has a significant impact on the overall gender pay gap figure.

Will pay gender pay and bonus gap figures have to be broken down according to grade / job type?

The Consultation also sought views on whether the gender pay gap figure should be broken down by grade or job types. The Government has concluded that this would not be workable for all, as many employers do not have standardised grading structures, particularly those with complex and changing structures resulting from mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, employers will not be obliged to break down the pay gap figures in this way.

However, as with hours of work, some employers may elect to provide this further layer of information in order to present a more favourable picture. Although presenting pay gap figures by grade or job role is clearly a more onerous exercise, it is likely to reveal pay gap figures which are considerably lower than the overall figure (assuming there is no pay discrimination).

Are employers obliged to provide a "contextual narrative"?

The Consultation sought views on whether the provision of an additional contextual narrative should be on an entirely voluntary basis, on a voluntary basis but covered in non-statutory guidance, or compulsory. The Response confirms that the provision of a contextual narrative will be entirely voluntary but that this will be “strongly encouraged” within the guidance accompanying the regulations.

It is likely that many employers will elect to provide some form of contextual narrative, particularly where the pay gap is relatively high. As stated above, some may choose to provide more granular figures (i.e. broken down by hours and/or job grade) where this would help to present a more favourable picture.

Many employers will also wish to accompany their pay gap figures with details of any remedial steps they are taking, or propose to take, to close the gap. A recent survey of over 1,000 private sector employees by Business in the Community revealed that 91% of employees would expect their employer to discuss the pay gap figures with them and outline their strategy for tackling the gap.

Are employers obliged to publish anything in addition to the gender pay and bonus gap figures?

In addition to reporting the pay and bonus gap figures, employers will also be required to report on the numbers of men and women working across salary quartiles. Employers will calculate the salary quartiles themselves based on their overall pay range. This is not the same as breaking down the pay gap figures by job grade or type. No comparison of pay is required here. Instead, what is required is a simple statement of the numbers of employees in each pay quartile by gender.

In addition, employers will also be required to publish the proportion of men and women that received a bonus.

Where will employers have to publish their gender pay and bonus gap information?

The Consultation sought views on where employers should publish their gender pay gap information. The Response confirms that the regulations will require employers to publish the gender pay and bonus gap information on their website in English and in a manner that is accessible to all employees and the public. The information must be retained online for 3 years.

In addition, employers will be required to send evidence of compliance with the reporting regulations to a Government-sponsored website.

How often will employers have to publish their gender pay gap information?

The Consultation sought on whether employers should report on an annual basis, every 2 or 3 years or some other level of frequency. Despite the majority of respondents to the Consultation favouring either a 2 or 3 year reporting cycle, the Response confirms that employers will be required to report on an annual basis. The Government’s logic is that annual reporting will help demonstrate progress, promote transparency and embed gender pay analysis.

The remedial measures needed to tackle a high gender pay gap will generally involve longer-term actions by the employer (e.g. increasing promotion / recruitment of women into senior roles or better support for women returning to work following maternity leave). This is another reason why employers may wish to accompany gender pay gap information with a contextual narrative. Employers can use the narrative to explain the proposed remedial steps and, importantly, set expectations on how long these measures will take to make an impact.

What support is available for employers?

The Consultation sought views on what measures would help support employers implement the new regulations. The Response simply confirms that an “appropriate package of guidance and support” will be developed to help employers understand the regulations and the required metrics.

What are the penalties for non-compliance?

The Consultation sought views on whether the introduction of civil enforcement procedures (e.g. the issue of an enforcement notice) would help ensure compliance with the proposed regulations. The Response confirms that civil penalties will not be introduced, but this will be kept under review in the light of rates of compliance by employers in the first few years of implementation.

It is surprising that a penalties system has not been adopted. Other European jurisdictions which have gender pay gap reporting systems in place, such as France, Sweden and Denmark, all operate penalties for non-compliance. By contrast, no penalties system operates in Austria and the Ombudsman for Equal Treatment there has recently reported that few employers have complied with their reporting obligations.

However, the Government does intend to:

  • run periodic checks to assess for non-compliance;
  • produce tables by sector of employers’ pay gaps;
  • highlight employers who publish particularly full and explanatory information; and
  • name and shame employers who fail to comply.

Further, the Equality and Human Rights Commission will be able to investigate employers who fail to comply.

What's next?

A further consultation covering the details of the draft regulations has been published. This will close on 11 March 2016.

The Government intends to put the draft regulations before Parliament this summer. It is expected that the regulations will come into force on 1 October 2016.

Employers will have to produce a preliminary data snapshot by 30 April 2017 and have publicly reported their pay gap information by 30 April 2018.

Comment

Employers should familiarise themselves with the regulations and identify who within their business will produce the information needed. Although the first reporting deadline is some time away, it would be advisable for employers to begin gathering data and calculating the figures now. This will allow businesses to understand what they are dealing with and consider what remedial steps to put in place now in order to reduce the gap by the reporting deadline.

Government Response and Draft Regulations

 

 

Find a Member

View or print a complete ELA member list »

Client Successes

Altra Industrial Motion Inc.

Altra Industrial Motion Inc. has multiple locations in the U.S., as well as Central America, Europe, and Asia. The Employment Law Alliance has proved to be a great asset in assisting us in dealing with employment issues and matters in such diverse venues as Mexico, Australia, and Spain. We have obtained excellent results using the ELA network for matters ranging from a multi-state review of employment policies to assisting with individual employment issues in a variety of foreign jurisdictions.

In one instance, we were faced with an employment dispute with a former associate in Mexico that had the potential for substantial economic exposure. The matter had been pending for over a year, and we were not confident in the employment advice we had been receiving. I obtained a referral to the ELA counsel in Mexico, who was able to obtain a favorable resolution of the dispute in only a few days. Based on our experiences with the ELA, we would not hesitate to use its many resources for future employment law needs.

American University in Bulgaria

In my career I have been a practicing attorney, counsel to the Governor of Maine, and CEO of a major public utility. I have worked with many lawyers in many settings. When the American University in Bulgaria needed help with employment litigation in federal court in Syracuse, New York, we turned to Pierce Atwood, the ELA member we knew and trusted in Maine, for a referral. We were extremely pleased with the responsiveness and high quality of service we received from Bond Schoeneck & King, the ELA's firm in upstate New York. I would not hesitate to recommend the ELA to any employer.

David T. Flanagan
Member of Board of Trustees 

Arcata Associates

I really enjoyed the Conducting an Effective Internal Investigation in the United States webinar.  We are in the midst of a rather delicate employee relations issue in California right now and the discussion helped me tremendously.  It also reinforced things that you tend to forget if you don't do these investigations frequently.  So, many, many thanks to the Employment Law Alliance for putting that webinar together.  It was extremely beneficial.

Lynn Clayton
Vice President, Human Resources

Barrett Business Services, Inc.

I recently participated in the ELA-sponsored webinar on the Employee Free Choice Act.  I was most impressed with that presentation.  It was extremely helpful and very worthwhile.  I have also been utilizing the ELA's online Global Employer Handbook.  This compliance tool is absolutely terrific. 

I am familiar with several other products that purport to provide up-to- date employment law information and I believe that this resource is superior to other similar compliance manuals.  I am delighted that the ELA provides this free to its members' clients.

Boyd Coffee Company

Employment Law Alliance (ELA) has provided Boyd Coffee Company with a highly valued connection to resources, important information and learning. With complex operations and employees working in approximately 20 states, we are continually striving to keep abreast of specific state laws, many of which vary from state to state. We have participated in the ELA web seminars and have found the content very useful. We appreciate the ease, cost effectiveness and quality of the content and presenters offered by these web seminars.  The Global Employer Handbook has provided our company with a very helpful overview of legal issues in the various states in which we operate, and the network of attorneys has helped us manage issues that have arisen in states other than where our Roastery and corporate headquarters are located in Portland, Oregon.

Capgemini Outsourcing Services GmbH

As an international operating outsourcing and consulting supplier Capgemini has used firms of the Employment Law Alliance in Central Europe. We were always highly satisfied with the quality of employment law advice and the responsiveness. I can really recommend the ELA lawyers.

Hirschfeld Kraemer

Stephen HirschfeldAs an employment lawyer based in San Francisco, I work closely with high tech clients with operations around the globe. Last year, one of my clients needed to implement a workforce reduction in a dozen countries simultaneously. And they gave me 48 hours to accomplish this. I don't know how I could have pulled this off without the resources of the ELA. I don't know of any single law firm that could have made this happen. My client received all of the help they needed in a timely fashion and on a cost effective basis.

Stephen J. Hirschfeld
Partner 

Hollywood Entertainment Corporation

As the Vice President for Litigation & Associate General Counsel for my company, I need to ensure that we have a team of top-notch employment lawyers in place in every jurisdiction where we do business. And I want to be confident that those lawyers know our business so they don't have to reinvent the wheel when a new legal matter arises. With more than 3400 stores and 35,000 employees operating in all 50 U.S. states and across Canada, we rely on the ELA to partner with us to help accomplish our objectives. I have been delighted with the consistent high quality of the work performed by ELA lawyers. I encourage other in-house counsel to use their services, as well.

Ingram Micro

Ingram Micro is the world's largest technology distributor, providing sales, marketing, and logistics services for the IT industry around the globe. With over 13,000 employees working throughout the U.S. and in 35 international countries, we need employment lawyers who we can count on to ensure global legal compliance. Our experience with many multi-state and multi-national law firms is that their employment law services are not always a high priority for them, and many do not have experts in many of their offices. The ELA has assembled an excellent team of highly skilled employment lawyers, wherever and whenever I need them, and they have proven to be an invaluable resource to our company.

Konami Gaming

Our company, Konami Gaming, Inc., is growing rapidly in a very diverse and highly regulated industry. We are aggressively entering new markets outside the domestic U.S., including Canada and South America. I have had the recent opportunity to utilize the services provided by the ELA. The legal advice was both responsive and professional. Most of all, the entire process was seamless since our Nevada attorney coordinated the services and legal advice requested. I look forward to working with the ELA in the future, as it serves as a great resource to the legal community.

Jennifer Martinez
Vice President, Human Resources

Nikkiso Cryo, Inc.

Until recently, I was unaware of the ELA's existence. We have subsidiaries and affiliates throughout the United States, as well as in Asia, the Middle East and Europe. When a recent legal issue arose in Texas, our long-time Nevada counsel, who is a member of the ELA, suggested that this matter be handled by his ELA colleague in Dallas. We are very pleased with the quality and timeliness of services provided by that firm, and we are excited to now have the ELA as an important asset to help us address employment law issues worldwide.

Palm, Inc.

The ELA network has been immensely important to our company in helping us address an array of human resources challenges around the world. I strongly encourage H.R. executives who have employees located in many different jurisdictions to utilize the ELA's unparalleled expertise and geographic coverage.

Stacy Murphy
Former Senior Director of Human Resources

Rich Products

As the General Counsel for a company with 6,500 employees operating across the U.S. and in eight countries, it is critical that I have top quality lawyers on the ground where we do business. The ELA is an indispensable resource. It has taken the guesswork out of finding the best employment counsel wherever we have a problem.

Jill K. Bond
Senior Vice President/General Counsel, Shared Services and Benefits

Ricoh Americas Corporation

We have direct sales and service offices all over the U.S., but have not necessarily had the need in the past for assistance with legal work in every state where we have a business presence. From time to time, we suddenly find ourselves facing a legal issue in a state where we have no outside counsel relationship. It has been a real benefit to know that the ELA has assembled such an impressive team of experts throughout the U.S. and overseas.

A few years ago, we faced a very tough discrimination lawsuit in Mississippi. We had never had to retain a lawyer there before. I was absolutely delighted with the Mississippi ELA firm. We received an excellent result. They will no doubt handle all of our employment law matters in Mississippi in the future. I have also obtained the assistance of several other ELA firms around the U.S. and have received the same outstanding service. The ELA is a tremendous resource for our company.

Roberts-Gordon LLC

Our affiliated companies have used the Employment Law Alliance in connection with numerous acquisitions, and have always been extremely pleased with our ability to obtain the highest quality legal advice on due diligence issues from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. We have found the Employment Law Alliance firms to be not only first rate with respect to their legal advice but also responsive and timely in assisting us with federal and state law issues critical to our due diligence efforts. We consider the Employment Law Alliance to be an important part of our team.

Rockwell Collins, Inc.

We have partnered with many ELA firms on the development and execution of case management strategies with very positive results. We have been very pleased with the legal advice and counsel provided by the law firms we have utilized who are affiliated with the Employment Law Alliance. The ELA firms we have worked with are customer focused, responsive, and thorough in their approach to handling labor and employment law matters.

Elizabeth Daly
Assistant General Counsel

Sanmina-SCI

Sanmina-SCI has facilities strategically located in key regions throughout the world. Our customers expect that we will provide them with the highest quality and most sophisticated services in the marketplace. We have that same expectation for the lawyers with whom we do business. With operations in 17 countries, we need to be certain that we have a team of lawyers working together to address our employment law needs worldwide. The ELA has delivered exactly what it promised-- seamless and consistent high quality services delivered in each locale around the globe. It has quickly become a key asset for our human resources department.

Starwood

We own, manage, and franchise hotels throughout the U.S. and in more than 90 countries. With more than 145,000 employees worldwide, ensuring that we comply with the complex web of local labor and employment laws in every one of these jurisdictions is a daunting task. The Employment Law Alliance has served as an important resource for us and we have benefited greatly from its expertise and long reach. When a legal dispute or issue has arisen in some far-flung place, Employment Law Alliance lawyers have always provided responsive, practical, and cost-effective assistance.

Wilmington Trust Corporation

Wilmington Trust has used the ELA to locate firms in California, Washington State, Georgia, and Europe. Our experience with the ELA lawyers with whom we have worked has always been one of complete satisfaction and prompt, practical advice.

Michael A. DiGregorio
General Counsel